search for: peaknet

I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the distant web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with the latest Firefox on my Windows 10 desktop PC, but not with Firefox 52.6.0 on this CentOS 7.4 laptop. This has been an on-going problem for several weeks. Google search results are sketchy. slashdot.org may have been a DDOS target today, but as I write this

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:55:04PM -0600, dsavage at peaknet.net wrote: > I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the distant > web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with the latest > Firefox on my Windows 10 desktop PC, but not with Firefox 52.6.0 on this > CentOS 7.4 laptop. This has been an on-going pro...

> Date: Saturday, March 03, 2018 20:54:56 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:55:04PM -0600, dsavage at peaknet.net wrote: >> I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the >> distant web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with >> the latest Firefox on my Windows 10 desktop PC, but not with >> Firefox 52.6.0 on this CentOS 7.4 laptop. This has been...

Can anyone tell me when the udisks, python-pexpect, and pyxdg packages in EPEL will be updated so I can install yumex under CentOS 7? Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package yumex.noarch 0:3.0.15-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: udisks for package: yumex-3.0.15-1.el7.noarch --> Processing

My workhorse server is a SuperMicro with their H8DM8-2 motherboard. For many years it ran CentOS 5.x and 6.x until the boot drive failed last year. I installed a 1TB SSD as /dev/sda and planned to install CentOS 7 on it, replacing CentOS 6.5 on the failed drive. Unfortunately every CentOS 7 media I tried, either optical disk or USB thumb drive, breaks down just a few seconds after selecting

...mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:39:32 -0600 From: "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage at peaknet.net> To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Fail2ban mail failures ??? Message-ID: <1419615572.4484.6.camel at lion.protogeek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm using fail2ban with CentOS 6.6. Something is causing fail2ban's alerts sent to root's...

On 21 Jun 2015 04:46, "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage at peaknet.net> wrote: > > What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 > somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've > tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. > For reasons that have have nothing to do w...

What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I don't think), I'm still booted to kernel 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64, and there are no other kernels installed.

Maybe there is a better place to post this message but as my question was still CentOS related thought I would start here. Please advise if there is a better forum of which to ask this question. I am playing around with making a "desktop" workstation out of a Raspberry PI3. I have had no problems installing the OS and pretty much have everything working except a Gnome desktop. I

On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:02 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > I managed to install F28 MATE packages to CentOS 8, so all is needed > is > to recompile those in EPEL. I too am a solid fan of MATE. F28 had v1.16. F30 has the latest v1.22. Is there any reason I should not try the latest? Perhaps some dependencies not available in C8? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL

On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:25 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > > As of now, I have a working MATE DM on CentOS 8. It's a hack though, > I > used Fedora repositories. But that means compiling MATE in EPEL > should > be straightforward, just recompile Fedora 28 packages. > > > I used Fedora 28 repo file and Fedora 28 GPG keys (links are > bellow), > unpacked

I'm building a new storage server. I was unable to use the CentOS-8- x86_64-1905-dvd1.iso image written to a 256GB thumb drive. It kept failing the integrity check. I had to use the much smaller CentOS-8- x86_64-1905-boot.iso image and do a network install from a mirror site. That's a first for me. Even though I selected "Server with GUI", the resulting installation boots to a

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 10:32 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400 > Eddie O'Connor wrote: > > > Are there .conf files for the desktop?....what about > > logs?....something's > > got to be amiss somewhere....and Linux always complains when it > > is.....in > > logs. Just wondering out loud... > > What happens if he sets up

On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 10:26 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing > > MATE > > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > > ripping > > the heart out of C8 by deleting

On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 16:12 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 05:24:13AM -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via > CentOS wrote: > > > > If you look at the listing attached to my last message, you'll > > > > see > > > > three different groups of packages: > > > > > > > > Removing: > > > > xxx > >

As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior kernel (4.18.0-193.6.3), all is well. If a local ZFS system is unavailable to the C8 kernel support folks,

When RHEL8 and CentOS8 were released, I was looking forward to setting up SAMBA as a AD DC server for CentOS8. But when I lifed the hood on the samba.spec file I found the option to build the samba-dc binary rpm has been disabled for rhel family builds. Apparently Red Hat does not want to support a unified SAMBA AD DC environment. I believe we have all of the componentns needed to set up a fully

-----Original Message----- From: ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su> Reply-to: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fail2ban mail failures ??? Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:30:39 +0300 Robert G. (Doc) Savage ????? 2014-12-26 20:39: > I'm using fail2ban with CentOS 6.6. Something is causing

-----Original Message----- From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 10:57:49 -0400 On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 10:20, david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > <snip>

I need some C8 troubleshooting help with MATE. I'm building a ZFS storage server with a SuperMicro H11SSL motherboard, EPYC 7232 CPU, and 32 GB ECC SDRAM. I installed CentOS 8.1.1911 from the iso as soon as it was released. I'm using the on-board ASPEED VGA video. I installed MATE v1.22 from https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stenstorp/MATE/. The following packages are installed: