search for: peachnet

I have an Asterisk server with 3 TDM400P cards. 9 FXO and 3 FXS ports. It also has 2 Astribank-8 units connected. The customer is having calls dropped at random intervals but several times a day. Could this be an issue with Interrupts with the 3 cards? I am also having a problem sending and receiving faxes when they are either connected to the Astribank or to an FXS port on the TDM

...t through a pri it connects normally. When I call it from these other two asterisk boxes out through whatever provider(my pri box, voip providers, whatever) it exhibits this behaviour.. Does anyone know what might be causing this? It's turning int a significant problem. Thanks Steve Glaus Peachnet Communications.

While I'm frantically scouring this list, does anyone have any information about getting BLA (busy line appearance) working on Cisco 7960? The last I heard was that this was unsupported in Cisco's SIP firmware

Hello, Can anyone recommend the 'best' kernel and zaptel versions to use with asterisk? we're currently running trixbox and are having numerous call quality issues(disconnects, echo, garbled speech) and I'm considering wiping the asterisk box and installing a virgin copy of centos, compiling asterisk myself and installing freepbx on it's own.. Is there anyone who can

Hello, We're in the process of moving to a PRI circuit for our asterisk switch. Can anyone point me in the right direction as far as PRI Cards are concerned? Thanks!

Hello, We're having some issues with CallerID and I thought someone here might be able to shed some light as none of our carriers seem to know what I'm talking about. The issues is this: A client of ours uses an after-hours voicemail service as mandated by their corporate office. We have a Day/Night setting that lets them turn this on and off. A call comes in from one of their

Hi all, I'm new to Astrisk so bear with me. I have just installed AsteriskNOW and am quite familiar with RH Linux. I have configured it and am using Xlite to connect and learn to move around the conf files. I have a problem, however. The client connects and dials ok, but there is no audio. In searching the archives I found discussion of this issue primarily centered on NAT issues. This is

I get the following error when trying to compile zaptel on CentOS 5 kernel 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5 CC [M] /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.o /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ? /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:171: error: ? has no member named ? make[3]: *** [/root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***

Hello, I'm trying to compile asterisk from source (1.2.18). Faxing is fairly critical for us, so in the past we've used spandsps app_rxfax and app_txfax to support faxing in asterisk. Unfortunately I can't find these applications on soft-switch.org anymore and even so I have a feeling they wouldn't patch correctly into 1.2.18. Does anyone know how to best handle faxing in

Hello all, I have some polycom 430's which I'm trying to get to work with asterisk. I have them working for the most port other than one little issue. The 430's have two line appearances. I'm trying to get the second line registered to a different extension but for some reason it's not allowing me to do this. The first line will register fine but the second line never

Hello, We're running into a problem I thought some of the enlightened people on this list might be able to help with. Our VoIP stuff has grown to the point where it makes sense to get a PRI (we've been doing things purely voip till now). The problem we're running into is this: We have several offices scattered across the SE states. We would like to be able to get local numbers

Hello, I'm trying to put together a low cost - low powers PBX appliance for several customers. I have purchased a couple of the soekris net4801 boards and have asterisk up and running on them fine but they just don't quite cut it in the processing power department. I've been able to get about 10 simultaneous SIP calls with simple ulaw (no encoding decoding). While this might be OK for