Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "pdouble".
Did you mean:
double
2019 Jul 23
2
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
...tely do not allow referencing local SSA values.
3.
For completeness, here is Johannes other suggestion without modifying
GEP/Load/Store:
%offset1= mul i64. %i, %n
%offset2= add i64, %j, %offset1
%1 = getelementptr double, double* %A, inrange i64 %offset2
%2 = llvm.multidim.access.pdouble.pdouble.i64.i64.i64.i64(double*
%A, i64 %n, i64 %m, i64 %i, i64 %j)
%cmp = icmp eq %1, %2
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %cmp)
The main motivation is to avoid that unprepared analyses such as
BasicAA have to give up when encountering the new intrinsic. 2. and 3.
only add things around as they...
2018 Dec 08
2
Solr
...;
- <str name="valueClass">java.lang.Integer</str>
- <str name="fieldType">plongs</str>
- </lst>
- <lst name="typeMapping">
- <str name="valueClass">java.lang.Number</str>
- <str name="fieldType">pdoubles</str>
- </lst>
- </updateProcessor>
<!-- The update.autoCreateFields property can be turned to false to
disable schemaless mode -->
- <updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema"
default="${update.autoCreateFields:true}"
-
pro...
2019 Jul 22
3
[RFC] A new multidimensional array indexing intrinsic
Am Mo., 22. Juli 2019 um 10:50 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes
<jdoerfert at anl.gov>:
> Why introduce a new intrinsic (family)? It seems that would require us
> to support GEPs and GEP + "multi-dim" semantics in various places. What is
> the benefit over a GEP extension?
Adding an intrinsic is easier than adding or extending an existing
instruction, as suggested by
2018 Dec 09
0
Solr
...lueClass">java.lang.Integer</str>
> - <str name="fieldType">plongs</str>
> - </lst>
> - <lst name="typeMapping">
> - <str name="valueClass">java.lang.Number</str>
> - <str name="fieldType">pdoubles</str>
> - </lst>
> - </updateProcessor>
>
> <!-- The update.autoCreateFields property can be turned to false to disable schemaless mode -->
> - <updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" default="${update.autoCreat...
2018 Dec 05
5
Solr
THen the Squat shall be maintained until the SOlr plugin is upgraded, as
Squat does resolve the problem (fts, partial search, etc...)
On 2018-12-05 12:20, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> It seems we forgot to document that "break-imap-search" was dropped in v2.3. That has now been updated.
>
> Also Solr does not support prefix/substring search unless you configure solr to support it.
2019 Apr 23
2
SolrCore 'dovecot' is not available due to init failure: fieldType 'text_general' not found in the schema
Hello, it seems an mismatch of schema file provided by dovecot-2.3.5.2
[root at mail conf]# pwd
/var/solr/data/dovecot/conf
# Below solrconfig.xml is from Solr-8.0.0.
[root at mail conf]# grep text_general solrconfig.xml
<str name="queryAnalyzerFieldType">text_general</str>
field types. Text content will be indexed as "text_general" as
<str
2019 Apr 23
3
SolrCore 'dovecot' is not available due to init failure: fieldType 'text_general' not found in the schema
...t;java.lang.Integer</str>
> <str name="fieldType">plongs</str>
> </lst>
> <lst name="typeMapping">
> <str name="valueClass">java.lang.Number</str>
> <str name="fieldType">pdoubles</str>
> </lst>
> </updateProcessor>
> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema"
> default="${update.autoCreateFields:true}"
> processor="uuid,remove-blank,field-name-mutating,parse-boolean,parse-long,pa...
2019 Apr 23
0
SolrCore 'dovecot' is not available due to init failure: fieldType 'text_general' not found in the schema
...="valueClass">java.lang.Integer</str>
<str name="fieldType">plongs</str>
</lst>
<lst name="typeMapping">
<str name="valueClass">java.lang.Number</str>
<str name="fieldType">pdoubles</str>
</lst>
</updateProcessor>
<updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema"
default="${update.autoCreateFields:true}"
processor="uuid,remove-blank,field-name-mutating,parse-boolean,parse-long,parse-double,parse-date,add...