Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pdidnot".
Did you mean:
didnot
2005 Oct 17
0
pdIdnot / logLik in glmmPQL
Dear R users,
I have been using the pdMat class "pdIdnot" (from the mgcv
package)instead of "pdIdent" to avoid overflow in GLMM fits with
the MASS package function glmmPQL, of the following form:
fit1 <- glmmPQL(fixed=y0~-1+xx0, random=list(gp=pdIdent(~-1+zz0)),
family=binomial) # vulnerable to overflow
fit2 <-...
2006 Jul 03
1
gamm
....but that the amount of smoothing is also changing per level of the factor?? Or is it only the intercept that is changing?
And where can I find some explanation on the magic output below?
Thanks
Piet
summary(b2$lme)
Random effects:
Formula: ~Xr.1 - 1 | g.1
Structure: pdIdnot
Xr.11 Xr.12 Xr.13 Xr.14 Xr.15 Xr.16 Xr.17 Xr.18
StdDev: 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679 1.680679
Formula: ~Xr.2 - 1 | g.2 %in% g.1
Structure: pdIdnot
Xr.21 Xr.22 Xr.23 Xr.24 Xr.25 Xr.26 Xr.27 Xr.28
StdDev: 1....
2013 Jun 07
1
gamm in mgcv random effect significance
...**********************
g1
$lme
Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
Data: data
Log-likelihood: -437.696
Fixed: fixed
X(Intercept) Xz Xint Xs(xc)Fx1
0.6738466 -2.5688317 0.0137415 -0.1801294
Random effects:
Formula: ~Xr - 1 | g
Structure: pdIdnot
Xr1 Xr2 Xr3 Xr4
Xr5 Xr6 Xr7 Xr8 Residual
StdDev: 0.0004377781 0.0004377781 0.0004377781 0.0004377781 0.0004377781
0.0004377781 0.0004377781 0.0004377781 1.693177
Correlation Structure: AR(1)
Formula: ~1 | g
Parameter est...
2012 Nov 27
0
Variance component estimation in glmmPQL
...of the assumed covariance structure (up to a constant)
of random effects c1 and c2, respectively, such that b1 ~ N(0,sig.1^2*I) and
c1 ~ N(0,sig.1^2*K1) , where K1 = Z1*t(Z1), and c1 = Z1*b1.
The model form I've been using is just the following:
m<-glmmPQL(y~1,random=list(f=pdBlocked(list(pdIdnot(~Z.1-1),pdIdnot(~Z.2-1))))
,family=binomial(link="logit"))
I've been extracting the variance components using VarCorr(), but I've
noticed that the reported variances associated with my random effects are
not even close to the values I get if I evaluate their variances empiric...
2006 Jun 06
1
gamm error message
...o
not match the length of object [0]
All the other output seems to be ok:
> summary(test$lme)
Linear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
Data: strip.offset(mf)
AIC BIC logLik
299.9468 312.9727 -144.9734
Random effects:
Formula: ~Xr.1 - 1 | g.1
Structure: pdIdnot
Xr.11 Xr.12 Xr.13 Xr.14 Xr.15
StdDev: 0.0001073404 0.0001073404 0.0001073404 0.0001073404 0.0001073404
Xr.16 Xr.17 Xr.18 Residual
StdDev: 0.0001073404 0.0001073404 0.0001073404 1.045916
Variance function:
Structure: Differ...
2009 Jan 28
2
t.test in a loop
Hi All,
I've been having a little trouble with creating a loop that will run a a
series of t.tests for inspection,
Below is the code i've tried, and some checks i've looked at.
I've used the get(paste()) idea as i was told previously that the use of the
eval should try and be avoided.
I've run a single syntax to check that my systax is correct and works
without any problems