search for: pdce

...inux/samba_dom/backup.tgz -U > administrator" Does the /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz directory actually exist ? To me it looks like a compressed file. I have a script that runs every hour to backup my domain and it uses this: samba-tool domain backup online -N --server="$PDCe" --targetdir=/srv/backups/$(hostname -d) --use-krb5-ccache=/tmp/backup_cc and I end up with the directory /srv/backups/samdom.example.com full of files like this: samba-backup-samdom.example.com-2023-11-20T12-45-15.011687.tar.bz2 I suppose I should also say that I run the script on a Unix d...

...nux/samba_dom/backup.tgz -U > administrator" Does the /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz directory actually exist ? To me it looks like a compressed file. I have a script that runs every hour to backup my domain and it uses this: samba-tool domain backup online -N --server="$PDCe" --targetdir=/srv/backups/$(hostname -d) --use-krb5-ccache=/tmp/backup_cc and I end up with the directory /srv/backups/samdom.example.com full of files like this: samba-backup-samdom.example.com-2023-11-20T12-45-15.011687.tar.bz2 I suppose I should also say that I run the script on a Unix d...

Hello everybody, i tried "samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz -U administrator" and got this error: ERROR(<class 'OSError'>): uncaught exception - [Errno 39] Directory not empty: 'sam.ldb.d' File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 185, in _run

Hallo lovely samba-people, did something change in regards to the online AD Backup in 4.20? We're using this CLI command to create a backup of our domain: ??? /usr/bin/samba-tool domain backup online --targetdir="/my/path" --server="rad-2.ad.ellerhold.lan" --use-krb5-ccache="/opt/samba-ad-backup/ad-backup.krb5cc" -N This ran successfully on a member server

I figured getelementptr exists as it does to facilitate data flow analysis, but it does need to be broken down before instruction selection. It's not just the missed optimization opportunities. It also introduces a huge amount of complexity into instruction selection as they deal with its complexity. It would also take care of many of the FIXMEs in LoopStrengthReduce. Vikram Adve

> > Now the problem is obvious.  A two dimensional array access is being > performed by a single instruction.  The arithmetic needed to address > the element is implicit, and therefore inaccessible to optimizations.  > The redundant calculations can not be eliminated, nor can strength > reduction be performed.  getelementptr needs to be broken down into > its constituent

...uction selector will select the code (e.g. the advice about allowing constant indices to be grouped together). This is *exactly* the reason why the new instruction selection framework was introduced. It already handles local CSE trivially, and will be extended to do GCSE, LICM, and eventually PDCE as time permits. Combined with loop strength reduction, these problems should go completely away. Also, with the new instruction selection frameworks, targets don't have to handle GEP instructions at all, so the "complexity" argument above doesn't apply. If you're intere...

...nux/samba_dom/backup.tgz -U > administrator" Does the /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz directory actually exist ? To me it looks like a compressed file. I have a script that runs every hour to backup my domain and it uses this: samba-tool domain backup online -N --server="$PDCe" --targetdir=/srv/backups/$(hostname -d) --use-krb5-ccache=/tmp/backup_cc and I end up with the directory /srv/backups/samdom.example.com full of files like this: samba-backup-samdom.example.com-2023-11-20T12-45-15.011687.tar.bz2 I suppose I should also say that I run the script on a Unix d...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking