search for: pdb_default_uid_to_sid

...Since the the old UIDs are unable to get convert with autorid we see > failure like as below, > > Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups > [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481290, 4, pid=10718, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), > class=passdb] ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1383(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) > pdb_default_uid_to_sid: host has no idea of uid 10000512 > [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481310, 4, pid=10718, effective(110007232, > 110000513), real(110007232, 0)] ../source3/smbd/sec_ctx.c:424(pop_sec_ctx) > pop_sec_ctx (110007232, 110000513) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2016/01/04 1...

...autorid we see >>> failure like as below, >>> >>> Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups >>> [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481290, 4, pid=10718, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), >>> class=passdb] >>> ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1383(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) >>> pdb_default_uid_to_sid: host has no idea of uid 10000512 >>> [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481310, 4, pid=10718, effective(110007232, >>> 110000513), real(110007232, 0)] >>> ../source3/smbd/sec_ctx.c:424(pop_sec_ctx) >>> pop_sec_ctx (110007232, 110000...

...Ds are unable to get convert with autorid we see >> failure like as below, >> >> Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups >> [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481290, 4, pid=10718, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), >> class=passdb] ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1383(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) >> pdb_default_uid_to_sid: host has no idea of uid 10000512 >> [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481310, 4, pid=10718, effective(110007232, >> 110000513), real(110007232, 0)] ../source3/smbd/sec_ctx.c:424(pop_sec_ctx) >> pop_sec_ctx (110007232, 110000513) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0...

...failure like as below, > > Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups > [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481290, 4, pid=10718, effective(0, > 0), real(0, 0), > class=passdb] > ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1383(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) > pdb_default_uid_to_sid: host has no idea of uid 10000512 > [2016/01/04 15:08:21.481310, 4, pid=10718, > effective(110007232, > 110000513), real(110007232, 0)] > ../source3/smbd/sec_ctx.c:424(pop_sec_ctx) >...

Hi, all! When I launch (again and again) smbcacls "//myfileserver/share" "" -U user -W domain or smbclient "//myfileserver/share" -U user -W domain -c "ls", in tcpdump output at myfileserver I see multiple calls to controller via ldap, therefore these commands are executed slowly. When I run getent groups at myfileserver, all worked fine, and tcpdump

...nd for idmap or I have something configured incorrectly... Here are the lines from my smb.conf idmap config CORP:range = 1000000000-9999999999 idmap config CORP:backend = ad idmap config CORP:schema_mode = rfc2307 [2013/07/05 14:47:09.217707, 5] ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1392(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) pdb_default_uid_to_sid: Did not find user joshua (1951526546) [2013/07/05 14:47:09.217775, 5] ../source3/winbindd/idmap_tdb_common.c:397(idmap_tdb_common_unixid_to_sid) Requested id (1951526546) out of range (1000000000 - 1410065407). Filtered! Has anyone else had this issue using uid number...

...I think so because in logs I see these strings: ...host has no idea of uid ... ...Connected to LDAP server... [2016/11/27 15:02:01.120598, 4] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_dual.c:1387(child_handler) child daemon request 59 [2016/11/27 15:02:01.120859, 4] ../source3/passdb/pdb_interface.c:1401(pdb_default_uid_to_sid) pdb_default_uid_to_sid: host has no idea of uid 3677 [2016/11/27 15:02:01.122042, 4] ../source3/libsmb/namequery_dc.c:77(ads_dc_name) ads_dc_name: domain=DOMAIN [2016/11/27 15:02:01.122161, 3] ../source3/libsmb/namequery.c:3133(get_dc_list) get_dc_list: preferred server list:.... ............

Hi all, On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:42:48PM +0200, Ervin Heged?s wrote: > > Dear Samba users, > > > > here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd > > 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy), > > which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine,

Hi I have a new Samba 3.6.10 server running on Solaris 10. The server is a member of the local Active Directory (which I'll call "DOMAIN" in this email). Unix username resolution is via NIS. All domain users have NIS usernames as well.Winbind is running to allow SMBD to perform sid>uid mapping and I have setup idmap_nss. I am not using winbind in /etc/nsswitch.conf as NIS

...ll_get_nt_acl smbd_check_access_rights 1.22% libc-2.6.1.so [.] __getegid | --- __getegid uwrap_getegid assert_gid set_unix_security_ctx set_sec_ctx set_root_sec_ctx smbd_become_root become_root pdb_default_uid_to_sid pdb_uid_to_sid legacy_uid_to_sid uid_to_sid create_file_sids posix_get_nt_acl_common posix_get_nt_acl vfswrap_get_nt_acl smb_vfs_call_get_nt_acl smbd_check_access_rights? -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? *QNAP* S...

...1.22% libc-2.6.1.so [.] __getegid > | > --- __getegid > uwrap_getegid > assert_gid > set_unix_security_ctx > set_sec_ctx > set_root_sec_ctx > smbd_become_root > become_root > pdb_default_uid_to_sid > pdb_uid_to_sid > legacy_uid_to_sid > uid_to_sid > create_file_sids > posix_get_nt_acl_common > posix_get_nt_acl > vfswrap_get_nt_acl > smb_vfs_call_get_nt_acl > smbd_check_access_r...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --