search for: pcuser

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8483 Summary: rsync: chown failed: Permission denied (13) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: cas at totallylost.org

...security = DOMAIN # security = SERVER encrypt passwords = Yes password server = winserv1 winserv2 * username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/usermap wins server = x.x.x.x log level = 3 log file = /var/log/smb.log Contents of usermap: unixuser=pcuser Log entries for the successful DOMAIN login with an unmapped user: [2005/02/01 15:57:58, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:ntlmssp_server_auth(615) Got user=[myuser] domain=[MYDOMAIN] workstation=[MYPC] len1=24 len2=24 [2005/02/01 15:57:58, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219) check_ntlm_password: Che...

...=3D /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m and trying it again. Then look at the log and search for a = sessionsetup&X line, and see what the=20 user name is.... =20 Possibly it is checking the password for the user (that is NOT greg), = to validate that user before it checks to see if it is a member of @pcusers... I don't rememver = offhand which check is made=20 first... Don -----Original Message----- From: Fernando Schutz [mailto:fernando@univel.br] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:06 AM To: Lista Samba Subject: Security Again Ok!!! Thanks a lot: =20 valid users =3D greg, @pcusers guest ok =3D...

...ge got mangled because of the attachments, so I'm reposting) I've got a samba 3 box that's part of an AD domain. It works correctly for most users; but there was a problem where certain users couldn't connect. We'd get a log message that looks like this: Username SAMPLE.COM\pcuser is invalid on this system It turns out that the users who could not connect are those who have a different unix username then their AD username. Even though I have a username map file set up, samba didn't seem to be using it. This bug appeared somewhere between 3.0.2a and 3.0.6. When we wer...

...gt;> create mode = 0700 >> username = XXX,YYY >> Hi, IMHO it seems that there are more problems there. At first Win9x makes the login to any SMB network with the user name that is used in the login screen when Windows is started. If you for instance login on your PC as "pcuser" Windows tries to log you in on the Samba server as user "pcuser". If "pcuser" does not exist or has a different password you where asked for a password. The user name is checked against the UNIX passwd if "encrypted passwords = no" or against smbpasswd if enc...

...dows from anyone's PC (or from a background task on the server). I'm not concerned about security - I don't mind if everyone on the network has RW access to /shared. I've managed to get it to work using authentication - ie. I've generated an smbpasswd file, created the user (pcuser) in unix and smb, set use encypted passwords = yes, and manually logged in from the Windows box as pcuser and can see /shared OK. What I'd like to do is open the /shared up to anybody so that it doesn't need any authentication. Is this possible? thanks for any tips -Rob

Until now, we've been using samba to push out unix files to windows users. With Security = domain, this works perfectly. Now we'd like to go the other way ie mount on the linux side our PC files. Using mount -t smbfs -username=administrator //pc-server/users /PCuser works but all files appear to be owned by root so users can't write to their own files. I can add dmask=777, fmask=666 but then anyone can overwrite anything. I was thinking of perhaps having the users mount the partition themselves eg add to sudoers smith ALL=/bin/mount and then havin...

Hi all, We've been trying to setup/upgrade a samba PDC (version 3.56) with OpenLDAP as backend and roaming profiles for Windows7 (32bit) Clients. windows7 has no problem with login after applying the reg patches, however, it seems to always load a temporary profile as opposed to roaming one for users, no local profile is created. this has caused Outlook 2010 to function improperly

...__________________________________________________ but from the netapp one the user has less groups: _________________________________________________________________________ filer::*> diag secd authentication show-creds -node filer-node2 -vserver cifs-node1-sata -win-name testuser UNIX UID: pcuser <> Windows User: COMPANYAD\testuser (Windows Domain User) GID: pcuser Supplementary GIDs: pcuser Windows Membership: COMPANYAD\test_share (Windows Domain group) COMPANYAD\noc (Windows Domain group) User is also a member of Everyone, Authenticated Users, and Network Users Privile...

...Files path = /share/samba/user directory mask = 0775 create mask = 0774 force directory mode = 0775 force create mode = 0774 writable = yes browseable = yes guest ok = no write list = @home valid users = @home, macuser, pcuser veto files = /.AppleDB/.AppleDouble/.AppleDesktop/:2eDS_Store/Network Trash Folder/Temporary Items/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/. at __thumb/. at __desc/:2e*/. at __qini/. at upload_cache/. at qsys/.digest/ delete veto files = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr recycle...

...in both this list and the invalid users list then access is denied for that user. The current servicename is substituted for %S . This is useful in the [homes] section. Default: valid users = # No valid users list (anyone can login) Example: valid users = greg, @pcusers "Travis Bullock" <tbullock@avmax.c a>...

.../log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 protocol = LANMAN1 max protocol = LANMAN1 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 33 preferred master = False domain master = False dns proxy = No guest account = pcuser printing = lprng [workinprogress] comment = staff directory path = /var/workinprogress read only = No force create mode = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 force unknown acl user = 0777 mangle case = Yes Any Ideas! .........? --- Ou...

Hi all, I'm using valid users parameter in my smb.conf to allow certain users to access a shared services but the list of the users are increasing. Is there any possibility to put the names in a file and mapped the file to this parameter or any other alternatives? Thanks,

...lid users list then access is denied for that user. The current servicename is substituted for %S . This is useful in the [homes] section. See also invalid users Default: No valid users list (anyone can login) Example: valid users = greg, @pcusers IIRC there was a discussion recently on this list about the interaction of this option with the "write list" and "read list" parameters, so you should perhaps also play with this ones. HTH, Wolfi --

Hi! I'm kinda new, so i'm wondering how should i configure [homes] section, so only two of many users (e.g. "user1" and "user2") could see it shared in network (so only those users could access their homes)? thanks in advance, andrej

hi all, i have integrated SAMBA with active directory and everthing is working . however in share defination i want to give write permissions to few users and read access to few users. i have mentioned write list and read list in samba config file as follows. this is working but all other known users (domain users) are getting read access . is there any way to restirct the same :( . this

...mes logon drive = I: logon script = SCI2.bat logon path = \\%L\profile\ local master = yes prefered master = yes os level = 34 wins support = yes guest account = admin admin users = samba [homes] comment = Home Directories browsable = no writable = yes path = /d/pcuser/%u create mode = 644 guest ok = no [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /d/ntprofile/logon browsable = no writable = no [profile] path = /d/ntprofile/users/%u create mode = 0700 directory mode = 0700...

Hi My Name is Ben.T.George i successfully installed samba and other all dependencies on my Solaris 10 (SPARC) machine. i stopped the default samba and swat and enabled these 2 from the installed location (/usr/local/samba/sbin) then i edited the smb.conf using swat.after that i got a smb.conf like this\ # Samba config file created using SWAT # from UNKNOWN (??? ) # Date: 2010/09/28 16:30:12

This should be simple, but I've been pounding my head against it for several hours, and I'm not getting the result I want. I'd like to be able to select shares, whether they are the root of a drive or /home/username and designate who can read and who can read/write. Does Samba have it's own groups to go with it's own users? I really can only use "security = user"

...referred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No kernel oplocks = No guest account = pcguest admin users = ict write list = ict oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/pcusers/%u read only = No browseable = No [NETLOGON] path = /usr/pcshare/NETLOGON guest ok = Yes # these shares are referenced in the logon.bat [applics] path = /usr/pcshare/applics [InterChk] path = /usr/pcshare/InterChk [menus] path = /usr/pcsh...