search for: pcmpgt

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pcmpgt".

2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...ersions passed that we can begin phasing out some of this code? As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. 3.1 added upgrade for: x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this 3.2 added upgrade for: x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signatur...
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...phasing out some of this code? > > As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older > upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. > > 3.1 added upgrade for: > x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this...
2017 Sep 20
2
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...e? >> >> As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older >> upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. >> >> 3.1 added upgrade for: >> x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this >> x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this >> x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases >> x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this >> x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this >> >> 3.2 added upgrade for: >> x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this >> x86.xop.vpco...
2017 Sep 21
3
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...phasing out some of this code? > > As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. > > 3.1 added upgrade for: > x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for thi...
2017 Sep 20
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...ersions passed that we can begin phasing out some of this code? As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. 3.1 added upgrade for: x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this 3.2 added upgrade for: x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this x86.sse41.ptest.* had its signatur...
2017 Sep 22
0
RFC: [X86] Can we begin removing AutoUpgrade support for x86 instrinsics added in early 3.X versions
...phasing out some of this code? > > As I'm writing these we don't seem to have tests for a lot of the older > upgrades. We've done better at this in the last few years. > > 3.1 added upgrade for: > x86.sse2.pcmpeq.* - we have almost no test cases for this > x86.sse2.pcmpgt.* - we no test cases for this > x86.avx2.pcmpeq.* - we have no test cases > x86.avx2.pcmpgt.* - we have no test cases for this > x86.avx.vpermil.* - we do test this > > 3.2 added upgrade for: > x86.avx.movnt.* - we have tests for this > x86.xop.vpcom* - we have tests for this...