search for: pcmpeqd

...g LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... > Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... > ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \ > /media/dh0/llvm-2.9rc1/utils/lit/lit.py -s -v . ) > ******************** > FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll (2396 of 5848) > ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll' FAILED ******************** > Script: > -- > /media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0/Release+Asserts/bin/llc < /media/dh0/llvm-2.9rc1/test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin | g...

...e+Asserts/bin/count 1 /media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0/Release+Asserts/bin/llc < /media/dh0/llvm-2.9rc1/test/CodeGen/Thumb/select.ll -mtriple=thumb-apple-darwin | grep __ltdf2 -- Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- Expected 3 lines, got 1. -- ******************** FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll (2396 of 5848) ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /media/dh0/llvm-2.9-build-O0/Release+Asserts/bin/llc < /media/dh0/llvm-2.9rc1/test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll -mtriple=i386-apple-darwin | grep pcmpeqd | /media...

Hello Xerxes, > llvm 2.9rc1 test on Dualcore ARM running Ubuntu Natty What is the gcc used for the compilation? Can you try to do the -O0 build and see whether this changed the stuff? -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi Renato, > I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed > that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe > that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, > is that correct? > > We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM > code is correct and don't regress, specially before

...dering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM >> code is correct and don't regress, specially before releases (I know >> it's a bit late for 2.9). LLVM 2.9 was forked off the trunk at Revision 127228 so the above regressions are not in LLVM 2.9. unfortunally a fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll regression got into the 2.9 fork. http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/588 - Revision: 127193 last known successful ARM build by the builder before the 2.9 fork. http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-arm-linux/builds/589 - Revision: 127214 failed fold-pcmpeqd-0....

Hi all, I was recently investigating the build bot infrastructure and noticed that the arm-linux target is failing for quite a long time. I believe that it means ARM code is not executed all that often in LLVM tests, is that correct? We were wondering what kind of support we could give to make sure ARM code is correct and don't regress, specially before releases (I know it's a bit late

Hi, Let's have a simple program: define i32 @main(i32 %n, i64 %idx) { %idxSafe = trunc i64 %idx to i5 %r = extractelement <4 x i32> <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>, i64 %idx ret i32 %r } The assembly of that would be: pcmpeqd %xmm0, %xmm0 movdqa %xmm0, -24(%rsp) movl -24(%rsp,%rsi,4), %eax retq The language reference states that the extractelement instruction produces undefined value in case the index argument is invalid (our case). But the implementation simply dumps the vector to the stack memory, calculates the memo...

Good morning. LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. On RC1, only one test failed. test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. (I don't mention clang tests :p ) ...Takumi Fedora release 12 (Constantine) Linux speedking.localdomain 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 27 17:09:35 UTC 2010 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux llvm config.status 2.9svn configured by ../.....

...-02-19-TailCallRetAddrBug.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified that the tests pass with commit r145974. The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with gcc version 4.1.2. The build process is basically:...

On Mar 15, 2011, at 7:25 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: > Good morning. > Hi Nakamura, > LLVM and clang can be built successfully on Fedora 12 PS3. > Hooray! :-) > On RC1, only one test failed. > test/CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-0.ll > Eric commented that this should be fixed on the release branch right now. > On release_29 branch, all llvm tests can pass. Woo! :-) > (I don't mention clang tests :p ) > >.> > ...Takumi > > > Fedora release 12 (Constantine) > Linux speedking.loca...

...a simple program: > define i32 @main(i32 %n, i64 %idx) { > %idxSafe = trunc i64 %idx to i5 > %r = extractelement <4 x i32> <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>, > i64 %idx > ret i32 %r > } > > The assembly of that would be: > pcmpeqd%xmm0, %xmm0 > movdqa%xmm0, -24(%rsp) > movl-24(%rsp,%rsi,4), %eax > retq > > The language reference states that the extractelement instruction > produces undefined value in case the index argument is invalid > (our case). But the implementation simply du...

...have a simple program: >> define i32 @main(i32 %n, i64 %idx) { >> %idxSafe = trunc i64 %idx to i5 >> %r = extractelement <4 x i32> <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>, i64 %idx >> ret i32 %r >> } >> >> The assembly of that would be: >> pcmpeqd %xmm0, %xmm0 >> movdqa %xmm0, -24(%rsp) >> movl -24(%rsp,%rsi,4), %eax >> retq >> >> The language reference states that the extractelement instruction >> produces undefined value in case the index argument is invalid (our case). >> But the implementation si...

...CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll >> >> 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk >> of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified that the >> tests pass with commit r145974. >> >> The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with g...

...g.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll >    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll > > 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk > of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011.  I've verified that the > tests pass with commit r145974. > > The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with gcc version 4.1.2. http:...

...CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll >> >> 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk >> of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified that the >> tests pass with commit r145974. >> >> The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with...

...g.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll > > 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk > of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified that the > tests pass with commit r145974. > > The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with gcc version 4.1.2. &g...

...nalyzeBranchCrash.ll > >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll > >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll > >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll > >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll > >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll > >> > >> 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First chunk > >> of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified that the > >> tests pass with commit r145974. > >> > >> The build is running...

...; define i32 @main(i32 %n, i64 %idx) { > > %idxSafe = trunc i64 %idx to i5 > > %r = extractelement <4 x i32> <i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1>, i64 > > %idx > > ret i32 %r > > } > > > > > > The assembly of that would be: > > > > pcmpeqd %xmm0, %xmm0 > > movdqa %xmm0, -24(%rsp) > > movl -24(%rsp,%rsi,4), %eax > > retq > > > > > > The language reference states that the extractelement instruction > > produces undefined value in case the index argument is invalid (our > > case). But the...

...CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll >> >> 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First >> chunk of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified >> that the tests pass with commit r145974. >> >> The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with...

...CodeGen/X86/2010-04-13-AnalyzeBranchCrash.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-11-SpillDead.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-10-12-MachineCSE.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/2011-11-09-FoldImpDefs.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/Atomics-64.ll >> LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/fold-pcmpeqd-2.ll >> >> 17 of these tests started failing with the commit r145975, "First >> chunk of MachineInstr bundle support." on 12/6/2011. I've verified >> that the tests pass with commit r145974. >> >> The build is running on a CentOS 5.6 machine with...