search for: pcm16k

...1.0. Even without using any of the new 1.1 features such as AGC or denoising, files encoded with the 1.1.11/1.1.12 speexenc.exe tend to contain wild amplitude-level variations, tonal artifacts, and clipped regions. Here's a good example of what I'm talking about: speexenc --bitrate 7500 pcm16k.wav speex.spx speexdec speex.spx recovered.wav If you run these commands with the file http://www.speakeasy.net/~jmiles1/pcm16k.wav in 1.0.4, the recovered.wav output doesn't sound too bad. Under 1.1.11, the recovered audio sounds terrible by comparison. So: what are peoples' thoughts on...