search for: pciback_ops

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "pciback_ops".

2014 Aug 20
1
[RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled()
...rv_core.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_init.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_ioctl.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/crystalhd/crystalhd_lnx.c | 2 +- > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 12 ++++++------ > include/linux/pci.h | 12 ++++++++++-- > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 +- > 27 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pci/bios.c b/arch/cris/arch- > v32/...
2014 Aug 20
1
[RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled()
...rv_core.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_init.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_ioctl.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/crystalhd/crystalhd_lnx.c | 2 +- > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 12 ++++++------ > include/linux/pci.h | 12 ++++++++++-- > virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 +- > 27 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pci/bios.c b/arch/cris/arch- > v32/...
2014 Jul 26
0
[RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled()
...- drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 4 ++-- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_init.c | 4 ++-- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_ioctl.c | 4 ++-- drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/crystalhd/crystalhd_lnx.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 12 ++++++------ include/linux/pci.h | 12 ++++++++++-- virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 +- 27 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pci/bios.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pci/bios.c index 64a5fb...
2016 Jan 30
4
Bug#810379: [Xen-devel] [BUG] pci-passthrough generates "xen:events: Failed to obtain physical IRQ" for some devices
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk < konrad.wilk at oracle.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:12:04PM +0100, Tommi Airikka wrote: > > Xen developers, > > > > After an upgrade of my Debian Jessie dom0 and domUs, my passthroughed > > NIC stopped working. > > This bug was probably introduced in Debian Jessie sometime > > between
2014 Jul 26
20
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...| 6 +- drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_init.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_ioctl.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 +- drivers/staging/crystalhd/crystalhd_lnx.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 12 +- include/linux/msi.h | 73 +++- include/linux/pci.h | 24 +- virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 +- 51 files changed, 929 insertions(+), 670 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/msi/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers...
2014 Jul 26
20
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...| 6 +- drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_init.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/esas2r/esas2r_ioctl.c | 4 +- drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 4 +- drivers/staging/crystalhd/crystalhd_lnx.c | 2 +- drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 12 +- include/linux/msi.h | 73 +++- include/linux/pci.h | 24 +- virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 2 +- 51 files changed, 929 insertions(+), 670 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/msi/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers...
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the