search for: pci_restore_msix_st

...nge altogether. Therefore I think that NR_PIRQS has to become a variable defaulting to 256 but getting initialized from a hypervisor reported value (perhaps in start_info, or else from a new (sub-)hypercall). 2) While pci_restore_msi_state() properly checks the success of msi_map_pirq_to_vector(), pci_restore_msix_state() doesn''t. Is this for a reason, or just because the code would get more complex if the error needs to be handled? 3) The type parameter of xc_physdev_map_pirq{,_msi}() seems superfluous, or is there any reason why these could be called with the respectively reversed types? 4) The hyp...