search for: pcbios

...in LLVM itself. > Yes, that is why LLVMDev is on Cc:, somebody will eventually reply ;) Not-Signed-off-by: Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- arch/x86/lib/delay.c | 2 +- arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c | 4 ++- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h index 69d2757..46d00a8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ extern int __get_user_b...

* Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote: > >>> > >>> > >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source > >> compilers too. > >> > >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result > >> so it's

...nline int romsignature(const unsigned char *x) +{ + unsigned short sig; + int ret = 0; + if (__get_user(sig, (const unsigned short *)x) == 0) + ret = (sig == 0xaa55); + return ret; +} static int __init romchecksum(unsigned char *rom, unsigned long length) { --- a/arch/i386/pci/pcbios.c +++ b/arch/i386/pci/pcbios.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <asm/uaccess.h> #include "pci.h" #include "pci-functions.h" @@ -301,7 +302,7 @@ static struct pci_raw_ops pci_bios_acc...

...nline int romsignature(const unsigned char *x) +{ + unsigned short sig; + int ret = 0; + if (__get_user(sig, (const unsigned short *)x) == 0) + ret = (sig == 0xaa55); + return ret; +} static int __init romchecksum(unsigned char *rom, unsigned long length) { --- a/arch/i386/pci/pcbios.c +++ b/arch/i386/pci/pcbios.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <asm/uaccess.h> #include "pci.h" #include "pci-functions.h" @@ -301,7 +302,7 @@ static struct pci_raw_ops pci_bios_acc...

On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote: >>> >>> >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source >> compilers too. >> >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result >> so it's not an unconditional 'yes'. But ... how much it actually matters >> depends on

Move header includes for the nopud / nopmd types to the location of the actual pte / pgd type definitions. This allows generic 4-level page type code to be written before the split 2/3 level page table headers are included. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Move header includes for the nopud / nopmd types to the location of the actual pte / pgd type definitions. This allows generic 4-level page type code to be written before the split 2/3 level page table headers are included. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

On 2009-01-23 20:30, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Having said that, llvm-gcc is not yet able to compile the full Linux >> kernel on its own [for example the boot code, due to asm(".code16gcc")], >> but with LLVM 2.4 it was possible to build "arch=UM", and "arch=X86" (by >> using

Hi All, I followed the instructions here at http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ However, when I do a "make menuconfig", I cannot see any XEN related configuration options. What am I missing? Thank you. Mr. Teo En Ming Dip(Mechatronics Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)