search for: pc8

...ed debug3: preferred hostbased,publickey,keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_lookup hostbased debug3: remaining preferred: publickey,keyboard-interactive,password debug3: authmethod_is_enabled hostbased debug1: next auth method to try is hostbased debug2: userauth_hostbased: chost enfm-pc8.utcc.utoronto.ca. debug1: ssh_keysign called debug3: msg_send: type 2 debug3: msg_recv entering debug2: we sent a hostbased packet, wait for reply debug1: Remote: Accepted by .rhosts. debug1: Remote: Accepted host enfm-pc8.utcc.utoronto.ca ip 128.100.102.101 client_user mikep server_user mikep debu...

...r of components, i can evaluate % of variance explained, or am I missing something?? 8 variables in the data set > princ = prcomp(df[,-1],rotate="varimax",scale=TRUE) > summary(princ) Importance of components: PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 Standard deviation 1.381 1.247 1.211 0.994 0.927 0.764 0.6708 0.4366 Proportion of Variance 0.238 0.194 0.183 0.124 0.107 0.073 0.0562 0.0238 Cumulative Proportion 0.238 0.433 0.616 0.740 0.847 0.920 0.9762 *1.0000* > princ = prcomp(df[,-1],rotate="varimax",scale=TRUE,tol=.75)...

...nalysis. I can do it very painstaking with text for each row and make sure that everything aligns and so on but i wonder if there is a better method than that. My summary follows: m1 PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 PC9Standard deviation 12.67140 8.252798 7.407514 3.71649 3.338228 1.974144 1.813919 1.416385 0.9981993Proportion of Variance 0.50054 0.212320 0.171060 0.04306 0.034740 0.012150 0.010260 0.006250 0.0031100Cumulative Proportion 0.50054 0.712870 0.883920 0.92698 0.961720 0.973870 0.9841...

Hey, I need some help. I want to obtain a cross validation for a regression model (binary response) but I got an error with CVbinary. Well I did this: fit <- lm(resp ~ PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5 + PC6 + PC7 + PC8 + PC9+PC10+PC11+PC12+PC13+PC14+PC15+PC16+PC17+PC18+PC19+PC20+PC21+PC22+PC23+PC24+PC25+PC26+PC27+PC28, data = dexp.cp, family=binomial()) CVbinary(fit) Error in sample(nfolds, m, replace = TRUE) : invalid 'size' argument I cannot understand this error, I was googling it, but i didn't f...

...= 0.08) pZ <- prcomp(Z, tol = 0.1) summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) I get for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : > summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) Importance of components: PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951 0.67490 Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943 0.01495 Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944 0.95439 PC9 PC10 PC11...

...# only ~14 PCs (out of 32) > > > > I get for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : > > > > > summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) > > Importance of components: > > PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 > > PC7 PC8 > > Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 > 0.76951 > > 0.67490 > > Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 > 0.01943 > > 0.01495 > > Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 > 0...

...Conditional 0.8681 0.4793 32 Constrained 0.0000 0.0000 0 Unconstrained 0.9429 0.5207 29 Inertia is variance Some constraints were aliased because they were collinear (redundant) Eigenvalues for unconstrained axes: PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 0.16008 0.14733 0.12183 0.09054 0.07380 0.06971 0.05578 0.04215 (Showed only 8 of all 29 unconstrained eigenvalues) -- Nevil Amos Molecular Ecology Research Group Australian Centre for Biodiversity Monash University CLAYTON VIC 3800 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...gt;>>> I get for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : >>>> >>>>> summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) >>>> Importance of components: >>>> PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 >>>> PC7 PC8 >>>> Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 >>> 0.76951 >>>> 0.67490 >>>> Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >>> 0.01943 >>>> 0.01495 >>>> Cumulative Proportion...

...Z, tol = 0.1) > summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) > > I get for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : > > > summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) > Importance of components: > PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 > PC7 PC8 > Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951 > 0.67490 > Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943 > 0.01495 > Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944 > 0.95439 >...

...reason why the name lookup should fail?) log.nmb: [2000/11/27 10:35:57, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.1.16: code = 0x0 log.smb: [2000/11/27 10:36:07, 1] lib/util_sock.c:client_name(1007) Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168.1.16 log.pc8: [2000/11/27 10:36:07, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [2000/11/27 10:36:07, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 6: ERRNO = Broken pipe [2000/11/27 10:36:07, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_sm...

...nditional 0.8681 0.4793 32 Constrained 0.0000 0.0000 0 Unconstrained 0.9429 0.5207 29 Inertia is variance Some constraints were aliased because they were collinear (redundant) Eigenvalues for unconstrained axes: PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 0.16008 0.14733 0.12183 0.09054 0.07380 0.06971 0.05578 0.04215 (Showed only 8 of all 29 unconstrained eigenvalues)

...of 32) >>> >>> I get for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : >>> >>>> summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) >>> Importance of components: >>> PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 >>> PC7 PC8 >>> Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 >> 0.76951 >>> 0.67490 >>> Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >> 0.01943 >>> 0.01495 >>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530...

...et for the last line, the summary.prcomp(.) call : >>>>> >>>>>> summary(pZ) # only ~14 PCs (out of 32) >>>>> Importance of components: >>>>> PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 >>>>> PC7 PC8 >>>>> Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 >>>> 0.76951 >>>>> 0.67490 >>>>> Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >>>> 0.01943 >>>>> 0.01495 >>>&gt...

...e tests/gem_exec_basic: Wait on outstanding work before returning from test tests/gem_partial_pwrite_pread: Remove commented-out code lib/gt: Make use of dummyload library to create recursive batch Arkadiusz Hiler (5): lib: Add Icelake platform definition pm_rpm: Skip PC8 tests when set limit doesn't allow entry pm_rpm: Lower the timeout for PC8 entry to 30s igt: Drop Intel from the name in docs and paths Update NEWS, bump version to 1.23. Chris Wilson (68): lib: Run gem_test_engine() in an isolated context igt/gem_ctx_switch: Meas...

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

...block6: ; preds = %return_block br label %forward_ref_end.prog post_goto_block: ; No predecessors! br label %sub1 sub1: ; preds = %forward_ref_sub1, % post_goto_block %call_func_str_tmpc8 = call %StrDesc* @cfunc_str_tmpc(i8* getelementptr inboun ds ([6 x i8]* @3, i32 0, i32 0), i32 5) %2 = call i32 @cfunc_print_str(%StrDesc* %call_func_str_tmpc8) %call_str_tmp_free9 = call i32 @cfunc_str_tmp_free(%StrDesc* %call_func_str_tm pc8) %3 = call i32 @cfunc_print_str(%StrDesc* @"...

We are going to be at the llvm-dev meeting the next two days. We will get back to you after that. Sri On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:07 PM Maksim Panchenko <maks at fb.com> wrote: > Hi Sri, > > > > Thank you for replying to our feedback. 7 out 12 high-level concerns have > been > > answered; 2 of them are fully addressed. The rest are being tracked at the > >