Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "pc14".
Did you mean:
pc1
2007 Nov 19
1
print matrix content on plot
...0.9981993Proportion of Variance 0.50054 0.212320 0.171060 0.04306 0.034740 0.012150 0.010260 0.006250 0.0031100Cumulative Proportion 0.50054 0.712870 0.883920 0.92698 0.961720 0.973870 0.984130 0.990380 0.9934900
PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 PC15 PC16 PC17Standard deviation 0.9269088 0.8002766 0.4510176 0.3911732 0.3414279 0.2566597 0.2248179 6.359533e-16Proportion of Variance 0.0026800 0.0020000 0.0006300 0.0004800 0.0003600 0.0002100 0.0001600 0.000000e+00Cumulative Proportion 0.9961700 0.9981600 0.9988000...
2011 Oct 12
1
CVbinary - Help
Hey,
I need some help.
I want to obtain a cross validation for a regression model (binary response)
but I got an error with CVbinary. Well I did this:
fit <- lm(resp ~ PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5 + PC6 + PC7 + PC8 +
PC9+PC10+PC11+PC12+PC13+PC14+PC15+PC16+PC17+PC18+PC19+PC20+PC21+PC22+PC23+PC24+PC25+PC26+PC27+PC28,
data = dexp.cp, family=binomial())
CVbinary(fit)
Error in sample(nfolds, m, replace = TRUE) : invalid 'size' argument
I cannot understand this error, I was googling it, but i didn't find nothing
really helpfull. Ca...
2016 Mar 24
3
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...tion 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951 0.67490
Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943 0.01495
Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944 0.95439
PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
>
which computes the *proportions* as if there were only 14 PCs in
total (but there w...
2016 Mar 24
3
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...0.67490
> > Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713
> 0.01943
> > 0.01495
> > Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001
> 0.93944
> > 0.95439
> > PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
> > Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
> > Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
> > Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
> > >
> >
> > which computes the *prop...
2016 Mar 25
2
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713
>>> 0.01943
>>>> 0.01495
>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001
>>> 0.93944
>>>> 0.95439
>>>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
>>>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
>>>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
>>>>>
>>>>...
2016 Mar 24
0
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951
> 0.67490
> Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943
> 0.01495
> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944
> 0.95439
> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
> >
>
> which computes the *proportions* as if there were only...
2001 Jan 17
0
accessability problem
...new to samba. can anybody help me with this
problem. i'm trying to install a network printer, not
attached to the samba machine (i mean not a local
printer to the machine that host samba server).
nevertheless, the other computer is in the same
workgroup as my pc. i kept getting this message :
//pc14 is not accessible
The computer or sharename could not be found. make
sure you type it correctly, and try again. (well, u
know, the message from microsoft os...).
the network is working since i can see all the
pcs in my domain(through network neigboorhood).by the
way, i'm using win 98 2nd ed w...
2016 Mar 25
0
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713
>> 0.01943
>>> 0.01495
>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001
>> 0.93944
>>> 0.95439
>>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
>>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
>>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
>>>>
>>>
>>> which...
2016 Mar 25
0
summary( prcomp(*, tol = .) ) -- and 'rank.'
...0638 0.03986 0.02713
>>>> 0.01943
>>>>> 0.01495
>>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001
>>>> 0.93944
>>>>> 0.95439
>>>>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14
>>>>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904
>>>>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050
>>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000
>>>>>>...
2016 Mar 22
3
Memory usage in prcomp
Hi All:
I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD
2016 Mar 22
3
Memory usage in prcomp
Hi All:
I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD