search for: pc11

...ddresses. - Domain controllers registered in DNS are not connected to the network or are not running. --- C:\Windows\debug\NetSetup.LOG: --- 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'PC11' is valid as type 1 name 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpCheckNetBiosNameNotInUse for 'PC11' [MACHINE] returned 0x0 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: name 'PC11' is valid for type 1 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 08/...

...DNS are not connected to the > network or are not running. > --- > > > C:\Windows\debug\NetSetup.LOG: > --- > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'PC11' is > valid as type 1 name > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpCheckNetBiosNameNotInUse for 'PC11' > [MACHINE] returned 0x0 > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: name 'PC11' is valid for > type 1 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 > ---------------------------------------...

...work or are not running. > > --- > > > > > > C:\Windows\debug\NetSetup.LOG: > > --- > > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: checking to see if 'PC11' is > > valid as type 1 name > > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpCheckNetBiosNameNotInUse for 'PC11' > > [MACHINE] returned 0x0 > > 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 NetpValidateName: name 'PC11' is valid for > > type 1 08/21/2024 00:18:10:477 > > ---------...

...;Failed to create ..." errors later on.) In the ldap database, the machine gets an entry like this: cn co114-pc12$ description Computer gecos Computer gidNumber 515 homeDirectory /dev/null loginShell /bin/false uid co114-pc12$ uidNumber 1008 while existing accounts look like this: cn co114-pc11$ description Computer displayName co114-pc11$ gidNumber 100 homeDirectory /dev/null loginShell /bin/false sambaAcctFlags [W ] sambaNTPassword 76B04CE668008AA41E9ED6829A71EE5E sambaPrimaryGroupSID S-1-5-21-474648322-3185173744-4186694333-1201 sambaPwdCanChange 1192187861 sambaPwdLastSet 1192187861 s...

.../mke2fs -m0 -v -j /dev/sdb1 fdisk -l /dev/sdb strace /sbin/mke2fs -m0 -v -j /dev/sdb1 ulimit -a -------------- ver_linux ------------------------- If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version. Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes. Linux pc11 2.4.10-ext3 #1 SMP Thu Oct 4 17:24:58 CEST 2001 i686 unknown Gnu C 2.95.3 Gnu make 3.79 binutils 2.11.90.0.15 util-linux 2.11k mount 2.11k modutils 2.4.1 e2fsprogs 1.25 Linux C Library 2.2....

...9 3.338228 1.974144 1.813919 1.416385 0.9981993Proportion of Variance 0.50054 0.212320 0.171060 0.04306 0.034740 0.012150 0.010260 0.006250 0.0031100Cumulative Proportion 0.50054 0.712870 0.883920 0.92698 0.961720 0.973870 0.984130 0.990380 0.9934900 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 PC15 PC16 PC17Standard deviation 0.9269088 0.8002766 0.4510176 0.3911732 0.3414279 0.2566597 0.2248179 6.359533e-16Proportion of Variance 0.0026800 0.0020000 0.0006300 0.0004800 0.0003600 0.0002100 0.0001600 0.000000e+00Cumulative Prop...

Hey, I need some help. I want to obtain a cross validation for a regression model (binary response) but I got an error with CVbinary. Well I did this: fit <- lm(resp ~ PC1 + PC2 + PC3 + PC4 + PC5 + PC6 + PC7 + PC8 + PC9+PC10+PC11+PC12+PC13+PC14+PC15+PC16+PC17+PC18+PC19+PC20+PC21+PC22+PC23+PC24+PC25+PC26+PC27+PC28, data = dexp.cp, family=binomial()) CVbinary(fit) Error in sample(nfolds, m, replace = TRUE) : invalid 'size' argument I cannot understand this error, I was googling it, but i didn't find nothing real...

...PC8 Standard deviation 3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951 0.67490 Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943 0.01495 Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944 0.95439 PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 > which computes the *proportions* as if there were only 14 PC...

...> 0.76951 > > 0.67490 > > Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 > 0.01943 > > 0.01495 > > Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 > 0.93944 > > 0.95439 > > PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 > > Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 > > Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 > > Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 > > > > > > > w...

...Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >>> 0.01943 >>>> 0.01495 >>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 >>> 0.93944 >>>> 0.95439 >>>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 >>>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 >>>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 >>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 >>>&gt...

...3.6415 2.7178 1.8447 1.3943 1.10207 0.90922 0.76951 > 0.67490 > Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 0.01943 > 0.01495 > Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 0.93944 > 0.95439 > PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 > Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 > Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 > Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 > > > > which computes the *proportions...

Hello, since a few days the computer in a branch office the computer take five and more minutes to load the user profile. In the user's samba log I found many lines of the type: [2011/08/17 12:36:09, 0] smbd/service.c:1188(make_connection) tonon-pc11 (::ffff:192.168.10.11) couldn't find service odb$ We don't have a service ODB defined on our samba server and never had. Is this a special service ? Could it be that the last patches from microsoft are the reason. Thanks Andreas

...re valid users = @qcbbwritetoquincectshare, @qcbbreadfromquincectshare # read list = @qcbbreadfromquincectshare create mask = 770 force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 0770 directory mask = 770 force group = @qcbbwritetoquincectshare [PC11Backup] comment = Share used to hold backups of PC11...and so on, much more to file

...; 0.67490 >>> Proportion of Variance 0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >> 0.01943 >>> 0.01495 >>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 >> 0.93944 >>> 0.95439 >>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 >>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 >>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 >>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 >>>> >>&...

...0.4352 0.2424 0.1117 0.0638 0.03986 0.02713 >>>> 0.01943 >>>>> 0.01495 >>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.4352 0.6775 0.7892 0.8530 0.89288 0.92001 >>>> 0.93944 >>>>> 0.95439 >>>>> PC9 PC10 PC11 PC12 PC13 PC14 >>>>> Standard deviation 0.60833 0.51638 0.49048 0.44452 0.40326 0.3904 >>>>> Proportion of Variance 0.01214 0.00875 0.00789 0.00648 0.00534 0.0050 >>>>> Cumulative Proportion 0.96653 0.97528 0.98318 0.98966 0.99500 1.0000 &gt...

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD