search for: pc050

Well! That does the trick. Thank you VERY much Rowland! Samba - General mailing list wrote > The way you have set smb.conf, PC050$ doesn't need a gidNumber, but it > does need a uidNumber, so check for one, run this on the Samba DC: > > ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > 'DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com' -s sub > '(&(objectclass=computer)(samaccountname=pc050$))' uidNumber |...

...ks winbind (via NSS) and > winbind (when using the 'ad' backend) will return data for users that > have a uidNumber AND their primary group has a gidNumber. For the > normal users this is Domain Users, but for computers, it is Domain > Computers. > > If 'getent passwd PC050$' doesn't return anything, then you need to > find out why. indeed, getent passwd PC050$ does not return anything. In the ADUC attribute editor it shows sAMAccountType : 805306369 = ( MACHINE_ACCOUNT) primaryGroupID : 515 = ( GROUP_RID_COMPUTERS ) gidNumber : not set I understand fro...

Hi there, I am looking for the same solution in my environment. I have a question: Do you need to manually set up a password for the machine account PC050$ ? Thanks - Allen On 11/20/2017 6:12 PM, tomict via samba wrote: > Well! That does the trick. Thank you VERY much Rowland! > > > Samba - General mailing list wrote >> The way you have set smb.conf, PC050$ doesn't need a gidNumber, but it >> does need a uidNumber, so ch...

...and winbind (when using the 'ad' backend) will return data for > > users that have a uidNumber AND their primary group has a > > gidNumber. For the normal users this is Domain Users, but for > > computers, it is Domain Computers. > > > > If 'getent passwd PC050$' doesn't return anything, then you need to > > find out why. > > indeed, getent passwd PC050$ does not return anything. > In the ADUC attribute editor it shows > sAMAccountType : 805306369 = ( MACHINE_ACCOUNT) > primaryGroupID : 515 = ( GROUP_RID_COMPUTERS ) > g...

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. I read the links you suggested when I setup my domain member configuration. Followed the links a s closely as I could. Just read them again. Did you mean to point me at some part I missed in order to get the machine network accounts to be able to access the shares? Which part? I removed the 'winbind' lines and 'username map' lines. They are

Hi all, I have exactly the same problem as the OP and tried the solution below, but I still get the error: 'Username IUCNNL\PC050$ is invalid on this system'. Should I map useraccount, enable Guest account, chang eunix directory permissions or things like that? Problem: My Windows 10 computers' machine accounts cannot acces shares on a domain member (samba 4.6 , id map = ad, centos 7). more detailed: Startup script...

Samba - General mailing list wrote > Do you need to manually set up a password for the machine account PC050$ ? Manually is relative :-) I scripted the bunch of PC's by first finding out at which uidNumber I could start counting and then put everything (PC and uid Numbers) in a loop. You could use ldbmodify, but since it was a small edit and not much PC's I used ldbedit like this: ldbedit start...

...to know about the users, it asks winbind (via NSS) and winbind (when using the 'ad' backend) will return data for users that have a uidNumber AND their primary group has a gidNumber. For the normal users this is Domain Users, but for computers, it is Domain Computers. If 'getent passwd PC050$' doesn't return anything, then you need to find out why. Rowland

Hi Rowland, >> File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all >> with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't >> necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. ... > 'SYSTEM' is a Windows group and is meaningless to Unix, it should be > mapped to a Unix ID only on a Samba AD DC and there it is an >

...I am testing with. I > tried the suggesion above to add "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" > to the share. This did not solve the problem, so I probably missed > something. -I do not want to make an other fileserver with backend = > rid if I can avoid it. > -If i map the PC050$ name to root i can access the shares, but i don > not want that permanently (security). I think I could add another > user and map computers to that name but that still seems awkward to > me. > > > Configuration info: > -The DC and the fileserver (FS1, the domain member) ru...