search for: pbzip2

Hi, I compile a .cpp with cmd: clang++ -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 -w pbzip2.cpp -o pbzip2.bc -lbz2 llvm-dis pbzip2.bc One function in .cpp is consumer_decompress. However, I look inside pbzip2.ll. The function name is changed to "define i8* @_Z19consumer_decompressPv(i8* %q) #0 {" Why clang adds a "_Z19" prefix and "Pv" suffix? Thanks,

Hi, I am dealing with very large datasets and it takes a long time to save a workspace image. The options to save compressed data are: "gzip", "bzip2" or "xz", the default being gzip. I wonder if it's possible to include the pbzip2 (http://compression.ca/pbzip2/) algorithm as an option when saving. "PBZIP2 is a parallel implementation of the bzip2 block-sorting file compressor that uses pthreads and achieves near-linear speedup on SMP machines. The output of this version is fully compatible with bzip2 v1.0.2 or newe...

Got it, thanks. But in my pass, I use function name to locate. Can I disable mangling in clang? Best, Haopeng On 3/1/15 10:44 PM, John Criswell wrote: > On 3/1/15 11:38 PM, Haopeng Liu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I compile a .cpp with cmd: >> clang++ -emit-llvm -c -g -O0 -w pbzip2.cpp -o pbzip2.bc -lbz2 >> llvm-dis pbzip2.bc >> >> One function in .cpp is consumer_decompress. However, I look inside >> pbzip2.ll. The function name is changed to "define i8* >> @_Z19consumer_decompressPv(i8* %q) #0 {" >> >> Why clang adds a &...

...wrote: > > Hi, > > I am dealing with very large datasets and it takes a long time to save a workspace image. > > The options to save compressed data are: "gzip", "bzip2" or "xz", the default being gzip. I wonder if it's possible to include the pbzip2 (http://compression.ca/pbzip2/) algorithm as an option when saving. > > "PBZIP2 is a parallel implementation of the bzip2 block-sorting file compressor that uses pthreads and achieves near-linear speedup on SMP machines. The output of this version is fully compatible with bzip2 v1.0.2 o...

...] %bb8 {7,20} > [3] %bb7 {8,9} > [3] %bb2 {10,11} > [3] %bb6 {12,13} > [3] %bb5 {14,19} > [4] %bb4 {15,16} > [4] %bb3 {17,18} > 0 opt 0x085643e8 > Stack dump: > 0. Program arguments: opt > -load=/home/a_i/llvm/llvm-2.7/Release/lib/ConsDumper.so -consdumper -f > -o pbzip2_2s.bc pbzip2.bc -debug > 1. Running pass 'dump constraints' on module 'pbzip2.bc'. > Segmentation fault/ > I have no hint about this. Does anyone know about the reason? Not yet. However I would love to find the reason. Can you reproduce this with the development version o...

If there were a ?zfs send? datastream saved someplace, is there a way to verify the integrity of that datastream without doing a ?zfs receive? and occupying all that disk space? I am aware that ?zfs send? is not a backup solution, due to vulnerability of even a single bit error, and lack of granularity, and other reasons. However ... There is an attraction to ?zfs send? as an augmentation to the

...> [3] %bb2 {10,11} >> [3] %bb6 {12,13} >> [3] %bb5 {14,19} >> [4] %bb4 {15,16} >> [4] %bb3 {17,18} >> 0 opt 0x085643e8 >> Stack dump: >> 0. Program arguments: opt >> -load=/home/a_i/llvm/llvm-2.7/Release/lib/ConsDumper.so -consdumper -f >> -o pbzip2_2s.bc pbzip2.bc -debug >> 1. Running pass 'dump constraints' on module 'pbzip2.bc'. >> Segmentation fault/ >> I have no hint about this. Does anyone know about the reason? > > Not yet. However I would love to find the reason. > > Can you reproduce this...

...3] %bb6 {12,13} >>> [3] %bb5 {14,19} >>> [4] %bb4 {15,16} >>> [4] %bb3 {17,18} >>> 0 opt 0x085643e8 >>> Stack dump: >>> 0. Program arguments: opt >>> -load=/home/a_i/llvm/llvm-2.7/Release/lib/ConsDumper.so -consdumper -f >>> -o pbzip2_2s.bc pbzip2.bc -debug >>> 1. Running pass 'dump constraints' on module 'pbzip2.bc'. >>> Segmentation fault/ >>> I have no hint about this. Does anyone know about the reason? >>> >> Not yet. However I would love to find the reason. &g...

Is anyone using something to log SIP results (connected/not, latency) that they really like? We do some logging using simple scripts writing the results of sip show peers to a text file if customers report issues, but it would be nice to have a tool that logs all the time and lets us do some better reporting. For example, graphs of latency in a time range, or a list of unreachable phones within

...ry {5,6} [2] %bb8 {7,20} [3] %bb7 {8,9} [3] %bb2 {10,11} [3] %bb6 {12,13} [3] %bb5 {14,19} [4] %bb4 {15,16} [4] %bb3 {17,18} 0 opt 0x085643e8 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt -load=/home/a_i/llvm/llvm-2.7/Release/lib/ConsDumper.so -consdumper -f -o pbzip2_2s.bc pbzip2.bc -debug 1. Running pass 'dump constraints' on module 'pbzip2.bc'. Segmentation fault I have no hint about this. Does anyone know about the reason? Thanks a lot~ Regards, --Wenbin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <ht...

Hi, I have tried to follow the instructions in the ``save`` documentation and it doesn't seem to work (see below): mydata <- do.call(rbind, rep(iris, 10000)) con <- pipe("pigz -p8 > fname.gz", "wb"); save(mydata, file = con); close(con) # This runs R.utils::gunzip("fname.gz", "fname.RData", overwrite = TRUE) load("fname.RData") #

...er Btrfs-devs that I''ve forgot, is there a chance we''ll see a xz file-compression support in Btrfs anytime soon ? I''m sure folks have been waiting for additional compression support besides gzip and lzo (bzip2 seems out of question due to its slowness, there''s pbzip2 but that''s not included in the kernel). This would be a really nice bonus due to the processors getting faster and SSD usage is more and more widespread - add an efficient implementation and we would have a fast, extremely efficient and feature-rich filesystem. My current situation is t...

...ing disk-based backup. I've tried scp'ing the files directly to my backup server, but the operation is too long (120 min). I tried generating a tar.gz directly to my backup server via SSH. A decent 40 minutes, using mgzip (multi-thread gzip), 70 Gigs. 120 minutes for a tar.bz2, using pbzip2 (parralel bzip2) (54 Gigs). A tar sent directly to my backup server is quite huge (318 Gigs). It is then taken to tape on the regular nightly backup. My concerns are: - Time needed to perform backup (downtime). - Time needed to do a recovery. For the backup, sending a tar.gz directly to the...

I have been using Fedora on my home desktop for close to an year, and I am happy with it, nevertheless I am considering switching to a slower-moving distro. CentOS + EPEL put together have less packages than Fedora. Moreover RPM Fusion has fewer packages for EL than for Fedora. I am wondering how can I install on my PC applications for which packages do not exist from one of the above-mentioned

Good morning. I am in the process of planning a system which will have 2 ZFS servers, one on site, one off site. The on site server will be used by workstations and servers in house, and most of that will stay in house. There will, however, be data i want backed up somewhere else, which is where the offsite server comes in... This server will be sitting in a Data Center and will have some storage

I''ve tried ssh blowfish and scp arcfour. both are CPU limited long before the 10g link is. I''vw also tried mbuffer, but I get broken pipe errors part way through the transfer. I''m open to ideas for faster ways to to either zfs send directly or through a compressed file of the zfs send output. For the moment I; zfs send > pigz scp arcfour the file gz file to the

...;> applied (first 2 patch(sets)) from list) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> in my case I tried to extract / play back a 1.7 GiB tarball of my > >>>> portage-directory (lots of small files and some tar.bzip2 > archives) > >>>> via pbzip2 or 7z when the error happened and the message was shown > >>>> > >>>> Due to KMS sound (webradio streaming) was still running but I > couldn''t > >>>> continue work (X switching to kernel output) so I did the magic > sysrq > >>>...