search for: pbond0

Hi all, I've been seeing this message fill my logs; pbond0: received packet with own address as source address I've tried; ip set link pbond0 down ip set link pbond0 arp off ip set link pbond0 up in /etc/systcl net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_ignore = 8 net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_announce = 2 I've 2 physycal nics bonded in mode0 called bond0. Are these...

Hi all, I''ve posted a few times with regards to this error and would like to phrase it a diff way because I have some new info. When running my Xen kernel in conjunction with the Gitco repos and using a mode 0 bond which is round robin, my logs fill with; pbond0: received packet with own address as source address When running a non Xen kernel but using the same type of mode 0 bond, I get no errors. My bond int is called bond0. I don''t think manipulating /etc/sysctl.conf will help because when I insert pbond0 in there, I get invalid flags....

Hi folks, I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2 consoles: > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed. > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address I have disabled console logging in syslog.conf, and even if I shut down syslog and kernel logger, the messages keep coming on the local consoles (not on remote consoles). So the question is: What process logs directly to the console bypassin...

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot. uname; 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen /etc/modprode.conf alias eth0 tg3 alias eth1 t...

Hello everyone, I''m trying to get multiple guests to connect their networks to the Xen network bridge xenbr0 that''s tied to two bonded interfaces. My current dom0 network looks like this: (eth0 + eth1) => bond0 -> pbond0 -> xenbr0 eth0 and eth1 are bonding under Red Hat EL5, and Xen is configured to use bond0 as the main network device. Xend-config is set to use the network-bridge script with netdev=bond0. The problem I''m having is that I can''t run more than one guest on xenbr0. Right now,...

...r. My server has two NICs, and I want to set up the following: NICs (x2) -> bond (mode 5) -> Xen Bridge -> Doms ...however, trying to configure this doesn''t seem to work: network-bridge steals eth0 instead of bond0, which breaks the bond AND my networking. The result is a "pbond0" interface with no IP, and occasionally a "peth0", also with no IP. In either case neither eth0 (or 1) or bond0 exist and as such I have no networking at all! If I boot without Xen the bond works fine, so I know that''s not the problem. If I reconfigure zend-config.sxp to ch...

...wn" ones. So should I set up firewalling to use/protect only Dom0''s own interfaces, leaving individual firewalls to DomUs, or should I set up firewalling on the physical interfaces (peth*)? To make things a bit worse I'' using bonding, where I currently see a bond0, but no pbond0 ;-) I haven''t investigated yet whether the default scripts do what they are supposed to do. I''m using the description in http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/17605.html ("SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 VM Network Configuration Examples"), but it leaves severa...

Running on Centos 5.6 with KVM... I was wondering if anyone had any luck configuring the NICs where eth0 and eth1 are bonded together with vlan support to a bridge? I noticed some threads show this as a possibility (http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2009-November/001417.html), but haven't had any luck implementing it. There also seems to be a bug with 5.6

Hi, I''ve set up identical (what I think) machines using SLES 10 x86_64, but a new one of those is saying frequently in /var/log/messages: kernel: bond0: received packet with own address as source address A short summary of ifconfig looks like this: bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:2A:12:9C inet addr:132.199.176.78 Bcast:132.199.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 eth0

..../network-bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=bond0.100 bridge=xenbr100 # Ooops (and/or panic) here! ./network-bridge start vifnum=2 netdev=bond0.200 bridge=xenbr200 2. Bonding + VLAN works - note the "enslave": ifup bond0 ./network-bridge start vifnum=0 netdev=bond0 bridge=xenbr0 ifenslave pbond0 eth0 eth1 ifup bond0.100 ifup bond0.200 ./network-bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=bond0.100 bridge=xenbr100 ./network-bridge start vifnum=2 netdev=bond0.200 bridge=xenbr200 3. VLANs don''t work with 100 Mbit cards (with 1 Gbit will work): ifup eth0 ifup eth0.100 ifup eth0.200 ./network-...

..../network-bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=bond0.100 bridge=xenbr100 # Ooops (and/or panic) here! ./network-bridge start vifnum=2 netdev=bond0.200 bridge=xenbr200 2. Bonding + VLAN works - note the "enslave": ifup bond0 ./network-bridge start vifnum=0 netdev=bond0 bridge=xenbr0 ifenslave pbond0 eth0 eth1 ifup bond0.100 ifup bond0.200 ./network-bridge start vifnum=1 netdev=bond0.100 bridge=xenbr100 ./network-bridge start vifnum=2 netdev=bond0.200 bridge=xenbr200 3. VLANs don''t work with 100 Mbit cards (with 1 Gbit will work): ifup eth0 ifup eth0.100 ifup eth0.200 ./network-...

...S xen4 repo installed by > centos-release-xen. The server has two ethernet ports configured in an > LACP bond. I have Xen configured to use network bridging. > > During boot, when xend was setting up bridging, the network link was > going down and coming back up as bond0 was renamed pbond0, etc, but > then it was dropping for good and the xend bridging setup was ending > with this error: > > RTNETLINK answers: File exists > > I narrowed this down to the fact that network-bridge was running > multiple times, and the instances were stomping on each other. It'...