search for: paypc

Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:38:54 -0500 > From: "Daryl L. Biberdorf" <darylb@superserve.com> > To: samba@sam > Subject: machine name lookups > Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980923213854.008144b0@pop.a001.sprintmail.com> > > > We have been looking for a way to notify our users when they > are running low on disk quota, without sending them mail. > WinPopup

...Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: sftp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: openssh-bugzill at r.paypc.com This entry is entirely motivated by a curious entry in http://winscp.net/eng/docs/history specifically, the following entry: -----> Workaround for OpenSSH limit of 256 kB for size of SFTP packet. Consequence was occasional interruption of transfer with error ?Connection has been unexpecte...

On 06/09/2017 05:13 PM, M. Balridge wrote: > I do know that this little box of horrors has 200-300MB mbox INBOXes on an > ext3 filesystem formatted in 2005. I am very nervous about converting them to > Maildir at this point. If I could get someone (or something) to the site and > replace it with something much more suitable, I could have these people join > the 21st Century. I

Comparison of Dovecot, Uwash, Courier, Cyrus and M-Box: http://www.isode.com/whitepapers/mbox-benchmark.html

On 12 Jun 2017, at 2.09, M. Balridge <dovecot at r.paypc.com> wrote: > >> I think it's just doing a lot of work on the mbox file itself >> (reading/writing/rewriting). Would be nice of course if it logged >> more information, but mbox format is a bit too legacy to spend >> much time on improving. > > I suspect...

...e FAQs or Changes logs, only that the support was ADDED sometime back in August]? Bad CVS check-in or merge? What's the story? If anyone knows what happened to this functionality and/or how to restore it, please let me know. I'd greatly appreciate an e-mail (mailto:spammail@mailgate.paypc.com) as this digested list makes it difficult for me to find replies to messages. Two other questions: 1) Are the Samba folks intending to add copyfile() [file to socket/socket to file, and in some incarnations, file-to-file(?) at the kernel level]. I know Linux 2.2 and the new FreeBSD have t...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Malcolm Baldridge [mailto:google@paypc.com] > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:02 AM > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: [Samba] How to share WIN partitions from SAMBA > (Dual boot) > Srvrto WIN clients? > > > [Replying to list] > > Quoting George Peters <wombat53@optonline.net>: > > &...

...s would probably hit the cpu less. John Snowdon - IT Support Specialist -==========================================- School of Medical Education Development Faculty of Medical Sciences Computing University of Newcastle >-----Original Message----- >From: Malcolm Baldridge [mailto:google@paypc.com] >Sent: 26 May 2004 09:50 >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: [Samba] conflict between Realtek 8139 (client) >and3c2000T(server) NIC's with Samba? > > > >> I *might* be a Realtek issue... I have heard that Sage (the accounts >> software folk) say tha...

Assuming one prefers to use the speex_encode_int() and speex_decode_int() when available, but fallback to speex_encode() and speex_decode() if an older version if the lib is installed, how does one best make the determination? The only thing I can see to do is call speex_init_header() and look at the result. Even at compile time it seems one must compile a test app that outputs that data and then

>>>>> "Malcolm" == Malcolm Baldridge <speex@paypc.com> writes: Malcolm> Well, for compile-time, I'd think that an #ifdef would do the Malcolm> trick. How? VERSION isn't included anywhere except in speex_init_header(), and I do not see any other symbols that encode the version.... That said, I looked at the code for speex_encod...

...GP or similar provides sufficient security against admin. Nice, short, pinpointed words I will file away for upcoming discussions. And I will file M's response, too, for the management. Thanks both of you. > -------- Original message --------From: "M. Balridge" <dovecot at r.paypc.com> Date: 11/08/2018 13:56 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: [trees-plugin] - Dovecot index gets corrupted, > ? when using maildir and recievend and accessing mail at the same time > Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > &...

On 07/10/2018 09:23 AM, dclist at list.jmatt.net wrote: >> A colleague asked me if it was possible for Dovecot to store messages >> in the cloud.? > > Does he have a more specific description of what he wants than ?in the > cloud?, or does he just like using buzzwords? ?From a user perspective, > I would say that Dovecot, or any other IMAP server, already stores >

...re actually used by dovecot? I was surprised by the pickiness of the group ownership/permissions issues, though reflecting on things, I can see why you'd at least want some logging by default for those conditions. His Timoness boomed: > On 9 Jun 2017, at 5.03, M. Balridge <dovecot at r.paypc.com> wrote: >> 1) In src/lib/compat.h there is a definition for p(read|write) >> that conflicts with the one in /usr/include/unistd.h [...] > > I don't know about this. Anyway, can't apply this patch since it > likely fails elsewhere. Fair enough. I knew this was...

"M. Balridge" <dovecot at r.paypc.com> writes: > I assume it's a rarely seen issue because few Dovecot users compile the > software in caves on computers powered by horse-pulled generator > wheels. I resemble that remark. >> Warning: Transaction log file /home/luser/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log >&g...

Hey folks, For reasons, I am trying to restrict what files the scp server will accept. I've been running "/usr/sbin/sshd -D -ddd -e" to try to debug what exactly is going on, program flow, etc, but I am not seeing the information I want. I have tracked the flow to sshd calling 'scp -t .', but I cannot seem to proceed from that point. I cannot seem to get any log or

Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or > respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off > the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. I used to let things like this

This is a 'has anyone run into this and solved it' post. And yes, I've been reading and re-reading TFM but without luck. The background is that I'm working on tooling before we start a mass maildir->mdbox conversion. One of those tools is recovering mail from backups (easy as pie with maildir). We've got all of our email on Netapp file servers. They have nice snapshotting

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:02:57PM -0600, Selphie Keller wrote: > I wonder if could be useful to set the fall back account to something user > defined to avoid suggesting people add passwords to root, though I do like > root since the account is always there, Since committing that diff I've heard of people running in production with no root password (ie *LK*, !! or similar).

> > We have identified a bug in auth process, and are working with a fix. > It works for me in 2.2.30-2 -- Angel L. Mateo Mart?nez Secci?n de Telem?tica ?rea de Tecnolog?as de la Informaci?n y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) http://www.um.es/atica Tfo: 868889150 Fax: 868888337

...l/var/locks root directory = / default service = message command = dfree command = passwd program = /usr/local/bin/smbpasswd passwd chat = *old*password* %o\n *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\ n *changed* valid chars = workgroup = PAYPC username map = character set = logon script = logon path = \\%N\%U\profile logon drive = logon home = \\%N\%U remote announce = remote browse sync = socket address = 0.0.0.0 homedir map = announce version = 4.2...