search for: payloading

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > There should be no functional changes here Would be good to explain what you did refactor here, instead of me trying to reconstruct it from the patch. Especially pre-coffee that helps :-) > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com> > --- >

There should be no functional changes here Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 9b1b5c9b1fa0..2ab16c9e6243

After applying the patches in my previous message... I'm getting the following when building dovecot for CentOS 6 (but not for CentOS 7): lmtp payload - normal: parallel pipelining ssl ....................... : ok CLIENT: Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1309 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed: (!conn->connect_succeeded) CLIENT: Error: Raw backtrace:

On 6/9/23 04:17, Eric Blake wrote: > In order to more easily add a third reply type with an even larger > header, but where the payload will look the same for both structured > and extended replies, it is nicer if simple and structured replies are > nested inside the same layer of sbuf.reply.hdr. Doing this also lets > us add an alias for accessing the cookie directly without

Currently, nouveau tries to go through the drm_dp_mst_port structures itself in order to retrieve the relevant payload and VCPI information that it needs to report to the GPU. This is wrong: mstc->port could be destroyed at any point, and additionally the payload could be changed at any point because it doesn't bother trying to grab the payload lock. So; remove nv50_msto_payload entirely

Hi, I was womdering, if anyone has experienced the same issues. When I run the tests after compiling 2.3.5, the following 4 tests fail: http payload echo (ssl): sequential .................................. : ok http payload echo (ssl): pipeline .................................... : ok http payload echo (ssl): parallel .................................... : FAILED: Test is hanging http payload

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > Some hardware (nvidia hardware in particular) needs to be notified of > the exact VCPI and payload settings that the topology manager decided on > for each mstb port. Since there isn't currently any way to get this > information without going through port (which drivers are very much not > supposed to do by

FYI, the Opus RTP payload format is now RFC7587: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7587 Cheers, Jean-Marc -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [payload] RFC 7587 on RTP Payload Format for the Opus Speech and Audio Codec Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:33:17 -0700 (PDT) From: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org To: ietf-announce at ietf.org, rfc-dist at rfc-editor.org CC: drafts-update-ref at

On 02/05/2019 06:52, Peter via dovecot wrote: > After applying the patches in my previous message... > > I'm getting the following when building dovecot for CentOS 6 (but not > for CentOS 7): > > > lmtp payload - normal: parallel pipelining ssl ....................... > : ok > CLIENT: Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1309 >

This was v3 patch 2/22, reworked to address the confusion about how a structured reply header is read in two pieces before getting to the payload portion. I'm still working on rebasing the rest of my v3 series (patches 1, 3-22) from other comments given, but this seemed independent enough that it's worth posting now rather than holding it up for the rest of the series. Eric Blake (4):

I'm still playing with ideas on how to split rstate from wstate (so that we can send a request without waiting for POLLIN to complete a pending reply), but this is some preliminary refactoring I found useful. I also fixed a couple of bugs while in the area (already pushed). There's a question of whether we want nbd_handle to be nearly 5k, or if we should instead keep it small and add one

So we don't ever have to worry about drivers touching drm_dp_mst_port structs without verifying them and crashing again. Lyude Paul (6): drm/dp_mst: Add drm_dp_get_payload_info() drm/nouveau: Use drm_dp_get_payload_info() for getting payload/vcpi drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_get_modes() drm/nouveau: Stop reading port->mgr in nv50_mstc_detect() drm/dp_mst:

Hi everyone, The WebAssembly backend recently had Bug 39448 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39448> filed against it because NaN payloads in floating-point immediates are not preserved through compilation on 32-bit builds. I took a look and the corruption takes place when the immediates are converted from APFloats to be stored as native doubles in MCOperand. I assume this bug only

As I said though, there's no lost ICMP packets, even when the IPSec tunnel drops out. I do notice a lot of these errors in the secure log though, would this be any indication of a problem? (I'm grepping for this specific error, they're not the only messages in there). Feb 11 14:18:10 site-a pluto[10450]: "site-b/1x1" #803: ignoring Delete SA payload: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP

Instead of repeating a check for valid reply headers in each sub-state machine, let's have a common helper function do all the work. Additionally, a central location will make it easier to uniformly capture any NBD_REP_ERR message payloads. --- generator/generator | 8 +-- generator/states-newstyle-opt-go.c | 40 +++----------

Hey Guys, I figured someone might have use of this at some point. I've created an iRule for our F5 Load Balancer which performs the following tasks: - Appends STLS to the POP3 Capability list (it does this blindly, so expects the backend POP3 server to not return this) - Watches for the STLS command and initiates SSL negotiation with the client (leaves the connection to the

On 7/05/19 11:08 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> CLIENT: Error: Raw backtrace: >> /builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/src/lib-smtp/.libs/lt-test-smtp-payload() >> [0x4547ea] -> >> /builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/src/lib-smtp/.libs/lt-test-smtp-payload() >> [0x454891] -> >>

Hi, (moving back to the list as some bits can be useful to everyone) > I am sure that 75 is the length of payload only. Confirmed > I also don't have idea for the package containing data of a length 46. > > To make everything more clear, Payload type in rtp packages is 97. > SDP defines the stream as > a=rtpmap: 97 SPEEX/8000 That's a dynamic payload number, so it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915 Summary: segfault in error case : expr_evaluate_payload not checking payload->payload.desc being null Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

Well. Centos 5 is really near of it's end of life. There is not much updates to kernel or openswan. You should at least try latest openswan version. Your issue looks like a bit network problem. -- Eero 2016-02-10 8:34 GMT+02:00 John Cenile <jcenile1983 at gmail.com>: > So lowering the keylife / ikelifetime didn't solve the problem. I've > enabled debugging and I'll