search for: pattern2

...erity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: patch_linams at yahoo.com Hello! Would it be possible to implement a copying process with file patterns to exclude and provide an option (something like -e "pattern1 pattern2 ..." or -e "pattern1" -e "pattern2") for it? Thank you for OpenSSH, guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Dear R-users, is there a way to pass a list of patterns to the grep function? I vaguely remember something with %in% operator... Thanks, St?phane. -- "La science a certes quelques magnifiques r?ussites ? son actif mais ? tout prendre, je pr?f?re de loin ?tre heureux plut?t qu'avoir raison." D. Adams -- AGC website <http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc> St?phane

...rch. I will agree with the fact using parenthesis is not the best idea we've got and perhaps we will remove them (at least to simplify searches). In filter "CN=CID 85 (Join)" the "(Join)" when not escaped is accepted as another filter pattern like in "(&(pattern1)(pattern2))" and that make the search returning nothing. Parenthesis should be escaped as in ldapsearch example but in that case ldbsearch hangs. Best regards, mathias

A general question that I have been pursuing for some time but have set aside. When finishing some analysis, I can have multiple matrices that have specific column names. Ideally, I would like to combine these separate matrices for a final output as a csv file. A generic example: Matrix 1 var1A var1B var1C x x x x x

Dear all, I'm looking for primary help at aggregating table() results and at writing a loop (if useful) My dataset ( http://goo.gl/gEPKW ) is composed of 23k rows, each one representing a point in the space of which we know the land cover over 10 years (column y01 to y10). I need to analyse it with a temporal sliding window of 5 years (y01 to y05, y02 to y06 and so forth) For each period

...::MatchRotate" function in DAGCombiner.cpp Pattern1 // fold (or (shl (*ext x), (*ext y)), // (srl (*ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y)))) -> // (*ext (rotl x, y)) // fold (or (shl (*ext x), (*ext y)), // (srl (*ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y)))) -> // (*ext (rotr x, (sub 32, y))) pattern2 // fold (or (shl (*ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))), // (srl (*ext x), (*ext y))) -> // (*ext (rotl x, y)) // fold (or (shl (*ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))), // (srl (*ext x), (*ext y))) -> // (*ext (rotr x, (sub 32, y))) In order to do this, code checks whether target supports...

...embedded regexes. That is, you could do > > DEFPAT[MYPATTERN]: Define a pattern here > > but you couldn’t do > > DEFPAT[MYPATTERN]: Define {{some|any}} pattern here > > although it might be reasonable to allow > > DEFPAT[PATTERN1]: some > > DEFPAT[PATTERN2]: Define [[PATTERN1]] pattern here > > as the [[]] substitution can be done when the directive is read. > > > > My $.02, > > --paulr > > > > *From:* George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> > *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2020 5:52 AM > *To:* Thomas Pr...

​Hi all, > I feel it might be confusing to have a CHECK becomes effectively a CHECK-NOT, > especially if the RUN line is far from the CHECK line (which is often the case when > a single RUN line drives several groups of CHECK directives (e.g. code generation > tested for several functions for a specific feature, like PIC). You also loose control > on where the NOT should be: