search for: patrickdk

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "patrickdk".

Did you mean: patrickd
2016 May 30
4
doveadm-server protocol change?
...gt; > aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > > ? > > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. > > > > Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try > > the xi.dovecot.fi packages. > > The question is, which of these locations is more trustworthy in the > sense of 'production ready'? > > -- > Heiko I'd consider xi.dovecot.fi more reliable myself. AKi
2009 Oct 07
1
Fwd: Re: "Time just moved backwards" in Dovecot in a Xen DomU
...unno, your email provider doesn't want to talk to me, heh, screw them :) They claim i'm on an rbl, no rbl checks verify this. Even tried to submit a request using their website, but it's broken and doesn't work (http://postmaster.ausics.net/pmg.php) ----- Forwarded message from patrickdk at patrickdk.com ----- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:31:37 -0400 From: Patrick Domack <patrickdk at patrickdk.com> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] "Time just moved backwards" in Dovecot in a Xen DomU To: Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> yes, using a pool server f...
2016 May 30
2
doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi Aki, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): ? > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try the xi.dovecot.fi packages. With 2.2.24 it works as expected. Due to the project state I'll not try the HTTP API right now (as the MTA (Exim) already speaks successful with the directors (via a Perl extension in Exim). Again, thank you for your instant help....
2016 Jun 05
2
Blowfish hashed passwords
...seem to me that these .c/.h files could be added to Dovecot for doing BLF-CRYPT hashing. This would mean all installations of Dovecot going forward would support BLF-CRYPT regardless of whether the crypt libraries have Blowfish built in. Kevin > On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Patrick Domack <patrickdk at patrickdk.com> wrote: > > > Quoting KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us <mailto:kevin at my.walr.us>>: > >> (I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can?t figure out how to reply to a reply.) >> >> Anyway, Aki Tuomi replied to my feature reque...
2016 Jun 06
2
Blowfish hashed passwords
...lready does. As previously stated. > > >> This would mean all installations of Dovecot going forward would support BLF-CRYPT regardless of whether the crypt libraries have Blowfish built in. >> >> Kevin >> >>> On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Patrick Domack <patrickdk at patrickdk.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Quoting KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us <mailto:kevin at my.walr.us>>: >>> >>>> (I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can?t figure out how to reply to a reply.) >>>> >&g...
2014 Dec 31
2
Postfix and Dovecot SASL - wiki update
I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki entry yesterday. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL The entry: submission inet n - - - - smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will
2011 Aug 11
2
Unknown setting: service
Hi guys, I setup a new box with Debian Squeeze 64bit and installed dovecot from the sources. However, I can't start dovecot or even use doveconf: root at imap01:~# doveconf -n # 2.0.13: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf line 111: Unknown setting: mail_uid Why is mail_uid and mail_gid an unknown
2009 Jun 10
2
Quota over NFS with inode limit
I tried searching this list, but couldn't find anything related to inode limits except for linux quotas. I wanted to add sieve support for our users, so was attempting to get our email system to use dovecot's deliver lda to handle email, instead of postfix's virtual lda, using maildir mailstore. When I did this, I noticed that emails would get stuck in the queue if a user was
2016 May 31
2
Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi, Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST): > Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: > In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job" The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both /etc/init.d/dovecot /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service > While xi packages places its own init script
2016 Jun 03
3
Blowfish hashed passwords
(I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can?t figure out how to reply to a reply.) Anyway, Aki Tuomi replied to my feature request saying: > We support in latest 2.2 release > > MD5 MD5-CRYPT SHA SHA1 SHA256 SHA512 SMD5 SSHA SSHA256 SSHA512 PLAIN > CLEAR CLEARTEXT PLAIN-TRUNC CRAM-MD5 SCRAM-SHA-1 HMAC-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 > PLAIN-MD4 PLAIN-MD5 LDAP-MD5 LANMAN NTLM OTP SKEY
2016 Jun 06
2
Blowfish hashed passwords
...;> >>>> This would mean all installations of Dovecot going forward would support BLF-CRYPT regardless of whether the crypt libraries have Blowfish built in. >>>> >>>> Kevin >>>> >>>>> On Jun 4, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Patrick Domack <patrickdk at patrickdk.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quoting KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us <mailto:kevin at my.walr.us>>: >>>>> >>>>>> (I subscribed to a daily digest for this list and can???t figure out how to r...
2023 Jan 05
1
Up to date dovecot packages on Ubuntu 22.4LTS
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:54:38AM +0100, Gerben Wierda wrote: > I just found out that Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS has a dovecot apt package that is 2.3.16. Debian 11 (stable) is at dovecot 2.3.13 with apt. if I looked correctly. Dovecot itself is at 2.3.20. > > That surprised me (I am new to the Linux distro and package management world) as Ubuntu 22.04 is a Long-Time Support version, and I
2016 May 30
2
doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi Aki, thank your for responding that fast. aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 17:49:53 CEST): ? > Hi! This has been fixed in 2.2.24. There was a bug in user passing. Ok, thus at least your answer saves me hours of debugging. We upgraded old Ubuntu Boxes (14.04/LTS) to 16.04 to get around some Dovecot limitations/problems. And now we got new ones :( We
2011 Apr 28
0
Outlook Calendar Connector Question
I would seriously doubt it, as dovecot doesn't do calendar's. Quoting Jake Johnson <jakej1978 at gmail.com>: > Is there a freeware or opensource calendar connector that will work with > Dovecot? > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > Thanks.
2015 Jan 01
0
Postfix and Dovecot SASL - wiki update
Disabling chroot doesn't fix the issue, it just worked around it. Aparently your chroot is not configured correctly, likely using debian based system, and your resolv.conf in the chroot is not updated correctly. Quoting Dan Langille <dan at langille.org>: > I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki > entry yesterday. > >
2011 Mar 07
0
POP3 with mdbox
I converted all my box's over to mdbox, from maildir and ran into this issue, I knew exactly what it was and fixed it, but might want to log a config error or something for others to notice the issue. I was running with pop3_uidl_format = %f, and well, that doesn't work with mdbox very well, and when a user ran a UIDL command, it errored the user out. Simple fix, but would
2014 Jul 12
1
Pigeonhole sieve misfile
I'm having an issue with sieve putting some emails into the spam folder, that should not be matching the spam rule. I tried looking but can't seem to find a debug option. Is there any way I can get a log of what the sieve rule path that matches so I can locate the misfiring rule? or maybe something else that is going on. I already checked the dovecot sieve log file, and there is
2016 Apr 30
2
Changing Password Schemes
This looks good, except it is truncated, it should be something like 95chars long, Is your hash column set to 128 or up around there or larger? Quoting Carl A Jeptha <cajeptha at gmail.com>: > Sorry for double reply, but this what a password looks like in the > "hashed" password column: > {SHA512-CRYPT}$6$wEn1UFuiMzl9OSjd$Vh/PZ95WDID1GwI2 > > ------------