search for: patosga

...ue type be? If I use the same function with the expand as the third argument like below: setOperationAction(ISD::FSIN, MVT::f32, Expand); What will the expansion look like, since I don´t provide any custom implementation of the node? Also, what is the meaning of the MVT::f32 in this case? Thanks, Patosga 2016-06-05 19:16 GMT+01:00 Pierre Gagelin <Pierre.Gagelin at myport.ac.uk>: > Hi Patosga, > > You are on the right place to ask your questions and get help! > > Try to be more specific with your problem. We need some details to help > you =) > > Pierre > > On 5...

...llvm works. I'm following a concrete example and visualizing the DAG and the .s output and some stuff doesn´t seem to match. I sorry to bother you but I don´t know where I can expose my doubts and I wonder if you could redirect me to some discussion place where someone might help me. Thanks, Patosga _____________________________________ Sent from http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com

...quot; or "store" which appear quite often? >From what I can understand this pattern is only interest in an add node with a mul node as one operator and an immediate as the other. Does the "set" (keyword?) translates to an output of the add node, or just another node? Thanks, Patosga 2016-06-06 6:22 GMT+01:00 Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>: > > Hi Patosga, > you can control what type the operands are promoted to as follows: > AddPromotedToType (ISD::ADD, MVT::i1, MVT::i64); > > For the "Expand" case, I believe you'll find w...

...gt; From what I can understand this pattern is only interest in an add node >> with a mul node as one operator and an immediate as the other. >> Does the "set" (keyword?) translates to an output of the add node, or just >> another node? >> >> Thanks, >> Patosga >> >> 2016-06-06 6:22 GMT+01:00 Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>: >>> >>> >>> Hi Patosga, >>> you can control what type the operands are promoted to as follows: >>> AddPromotedToType (ISD::ADD, MVT::i1, MVT::i64); >>&...