Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "path_to_librari".
Did you mean:
path_to_library
2015 Jul 02
2
[LLVMdev] Load MachineFunctionPass plugin from library in llc?
Hi all,
I am working on creating a MachineFunctionPass to perform an analysis on X86
code. After a bit of trouble, I was able to get my pass compiling and
running correctly in llc. However, since a machine pass is compiled directly
into the code generator, rerunning "make" across the LLVM build tree
involves re-linking most of the major libraries and executables. This is a
rather
2015 Jul 02
2
[LLVMdev] Load MachineFunctionPass plugin from library in llc?
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Ethan J. Johnson <ejohns48 at cs.rochester.edu <mailto:ejohns48 at cs.rochester.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am working on creating a MachineFunctionPass to perform an analysis on X86 code. After a bit of trouble, I was
2020 Sep 30
2
OrcV1 removal
Hi,
On 2020-09-29 13:58:35 -0700, Lang Hames wrote:
> > Have the basics working. Should I open a PR to your branch for what I
> > got so far?
> Sounds good to me.
Done, https://github.com/lhames/llvm-project/pull/2 .
> The first is to expose more of symbol resolution. Postgres can be
> > extended via dynamically loaded libraries, and we need to be careful to
> >
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Using custom LLVM Passes with clang
Hello,
I have written a custom LLVM Loop Pass that perforates a loop by
changing the increment value for the induction variable. I am able to run
this pass using the opt command and loading the shared object library from
Debug+Asserts as detailed in http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
I was wondering if this pass can be used in clang somehow. I have read
about "-mllvm"
2020 Sep 29
3
OrcV1 removal
Hi,
On 2020-09-25 16:38:41 -0700, Andres Freund via llvm-dev wrote:
> On 2020-09-24 16:34:30 -0700, Lang Hames wrote:
> > If anyone wants to check out the OrcV1 removal branch and provide feedback
> > now is the time. Otherwise I will aim to land the work in the mainline
> > early next week.
>
> I'm trying to get it to work with postgres. Unfortunately this week