search for: path64

...> >want to release the code? > Initially the code will continue to be developed privately, but > there's a big ?<question mark> and sticky note to look at what makes > best sense - It's a conservative approach, but that's how it is for > now. Given the nature of path64, I think it would be nice to keep all parsing related parts and all semantic analysis open. It would also be nice to keep functional tests for the code generation as open as possible, even if might not fit into a "main" repository due to testing executable code. The goal would be to allow...

...> Initially the code will continue to be developed privately, but > > there's a big ?<question mark> and sticky note to look at what > > makes > > best sense - It's a conservative approach, but that's how it is for > > now. > > Given the nature of path64, I think it would be nice to keep all > parsing > related parts and all semantic analysis open. It would also be nice > to > keep functional tests for the code generation as open as possible, > even > if might not fit into a "main" repository due to testing executable &g...

On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a >> report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in >> July: >>