search for: paternity

On 9/4/23 16:43, Joseph S. Testa II wrote: > I very often see IT personnel and developers simply use the default > options for ssh-keygen. They just don't care/don't know to care. > Switching the default to ED25519 would bring the equivalent security > up from 112-bits to 128-bits (as 2048-bit RSA is equivalent to 112-bits > of symmetric strength), which would be a nice

I wanted to start making some change. But I thought and I don't understand why it's necessary to add @. // RUN: FileCheck %s // CHECK-DEFINE-PATERN: register(n): {{[a-z]+}}n // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] This example will be equivalent to // RUN:

Hello, We manage a mail server using Dovecot under Debian. Since a long time, we run nightly a script permitting to display the storage usage of each user on the webmail, using internal calls. The usage on each mailbox is stored in a Mysql database. For several reasons, we would now want to use the IMAP quota feature, not only to let users have the quota displayed from their Mail clients. But

Ok, when I change syntax I will load new patch. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:38 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements It is necessary to be

Hi all, As you knwo already, I'm trying to change DAGCombiner so that it process the nodes in topological order. Doing so is not difficult per se, but this creates various improvements and regression to the existing test suite. I'd like to work through as many of the regressions as possible ahead of time. One source of such regressions is combineIncDecVector in the X86 backend. It

> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I

Hi. I have shifted from redhat 7.1 to 7.2, and have several machines running both versions now. I have noticed, that the memory usage patern is very different on machines using ext2 and ext3 - the ones using ext2 usually use 5-10 MB of "buff" memory, but the ones with ext3 grow to 50MB on machines with 128MB, and to 250MB with on machine with 512 MB. I have conducted a test, and changed

Hi. I have shifted from redhat 7.1 to 7.2, and have several machines running both versions now. I have noticed, that the memory usage patern is very different on machines using ext2 and ext3 - the ones using ext2 usually use 5-10 MB of "buff" memory, but the ones with ext3 grow to 50MB on machines with 128MB, and to 250MB with on machine with 512 MB. I have conducted a test, and changed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I made some filters on tc to match the VoIP traffic based on RTP packet RFC 1889. The only patern I found was the rtp version and the payload type wich identify the codec. The u32 rules are: - - match ip protocol 0x11 0xff -> UDP - - match u8 0x80 0xc0 at 28 -> RTP version 2 (two fists bits ''10'' of the byte) - -

No objections from me to make it run later. I didn't see the potential conflicts when I added that code. Delayed combine, custom lowering, or DAGToDAGISel all seem like viable options to me. On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:04 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > I have previously posted these two patches: > > [X86][CodeGen][NFC] Delay `combineIncDecVector()` from

I think DAGToDAG is too late because the build_vector has already been turned into a constant pool load by then so it’s a little difficult to get back. Maybe we can delay it to !DCI.isBeforeLegalizeOps()? That would at least let the first DAG combine and the post type legalization DAG combine see the add, 1. +Sanjay as well From: Amaury Séchet <deadalnix at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August

Yes, I now understand what you suggested. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: car(make, model, year): {{Found a }} make model {{, from }} year But I think that in pattern I should show that I use parameter. I thought that patterns can also be simple strings. All strings should be regexs in pattern and parameters can't be used in pattern in your example. But I want to use parameters in regexs. For

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Bug ID: 92959 Summary: [NV1F celcius GeForce4 MX] Rendering artifacts, screen corruption, system reset. Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium

Okay, I guess I?ll be the first to take Colin Percival up in that the following statement applies to me: ?If you find a security problem -- or even if you find something which might possibly be a security problem but you're not certain if it is or not -- then please let us know.? I recently installed pam_radius according to the instructions located at the following address:

Hello, I am a final semester Dual Degree( B.Tech. M.Tech.) student from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. I was looking forward to participate in this year's GSoC 2009.Starting Fall 2009 i shall be pursuing a Phd in compilers. I am having a good background in compilers. My current masters thesis is aimed at automatic parallel code from c programs target for the Cell Processor using

...ks. All I can tell you now is about what I did and about my sources. So, considering your enthusiasm, I suggest you take the code I wrote and continue or use as reference. If you want this, let me know. If not, then I ask you for same patience, since I have not much time. It's not important the paternity of the driver, but the driver done. I just think it should not be published before tested. Now, let's talk about your lest comments. >Which says nothing. The above text applies to renderers and capture >filters, not to intermediate filters like compressors. Especially all >standard A...

Hello All- I've looked in several places and haven't found an answer to this question: is it possible to have libvirt add custom rules to iptables for virtual network interfaces? I took a look at the "Firewall and Network Filtering in Libvirt" page and it seems overly complicated for what I want to do. Given an interface virbr2 and its network 192.168.4.0/24, libvirt installs

Here is my formal proposal i have submitted in gsoc. Comments invited. About me: I am a final semester Dual Degree( B.Tech. M.Tech.) student from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. I was looking forward to participate in this year's GSoC 2009.Starting Fall 2009 i shall be pursuing a Phd in compilers. I am having a good background in compilers. My current masters thesis is aimed at

Hi all, Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace

Hi, libvirts nwfilter module can achieve that. I'm currently working on opt-out patches to disable that functionality if wished. I also don't use firewalld. It's both paternalizing and annoying and takes away user flexilibity in exchange for nothing. anyways Check the nwfilter page to write own filters for the beginning: https://libvirt.org/formatnwfilter.html#nwfwrite some