search for: pater

...(of, virtio_mmio_match); >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> + { } >> +}; > > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. > > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 > is released? Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were what the kernel was looking for... -- PMM

...(of, virtio_mmio_match); >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> + { } >> +}; > > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. > > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 > is released? Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were what the kernel was looking for... -- PMM

...>> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> >> + { } >> >> +}; >> > >> > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. >> > >> > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 >> > is released? >> >> Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. >> I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were >> what the kernel was looking for......

...>> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> >> + { } >> >> +}; >> > >> > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. >> > >> > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 >> > is released? >> >> Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. >> I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were >> what the kernel was looking for......

Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu ARM64 ACPI support. http://git.linaro.org/people/shannon.zhao/qemu.git/commit/d0bf1955a3ecbab4b51d46f8c5dda02b7e14a17e Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory at linaro.org> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10

Added the match table and pointers for ACPI probing to the driver. This uses the same identifier for virt devices as being used for qemu ARM64 ACPI support. http://git.linaro.org/people/shannon.zhao/qemu.git/commit/d0bf1955a3ecbab4b51d46f8c5dda02b7e14a17e Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory at linaro.org> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10

...o_match[] = { > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, virtio_mmio_match); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { > + { "LNRO0005", }, > + { } > +}; Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 is released? > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, virtio_mmio_acpi_match); > +#endif > + > static struct platform_driver virtio_mmio_driver = { > .probe = virtio_mmio_probe, > .remove = virtio_mmio_remove, > ....

...t; +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > >> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { > >> + { "LNRO0005", }, > >> + { } > >> +}; > > > > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. > > > > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 > > is released? > > Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. > I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were > what the kernel was looking for... > > -- PMM...

...t acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >>> >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >>> >> + { } >>> >> +}; >>> > >>> > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. >>> > >>> > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 >>> > is released? >>> >>> Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. >>> I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were >>> what the kernel...

On 31.10.13 04:34, Miguel Clara wrote: > I was trying to get a core-dump for a domU with xl and got this error: > > # xl dump-core 20 test.core > Memory fault > > GDB shows this: > > a# gdb xl xl.core > GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.1 > Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later<http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> >

...>> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> >> + { } >> >> +}; >> > >> > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. >> > >> > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 >> > is released? >> >> Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. >> I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were >> what the kernel was looking for......

...>> +static const struct acpi_device_id virtio_mmio_acpi_match[] = { >> >> + { "LNRO0005", }, >> >> + { } >> >> +}; >> > >> > Hmm - we have reserved QEMUXXXX in ASWG explicitly for this purpose. >> > >> > Pater - do you think it's a good idea to change this before QEMU 2.4 >> > is released? >> >> Shannon's call, I guess. I don't know enough about ACPI to say. >> I thought these ACPI IDs were already fixed because they were >> what the kernel was looking for......