Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "patchpkx".
2006 Apr 20
0
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
...?
???I&?i
dQa?W
(hf`??????S??(rR?
?Es?i??c?3?B???L??????N?9?]???E?8
K???H,??l?? K#F ?r???q
?M????X????_??_r????
??C?p????Y?|?:??h?w8??
??e?/?%????j?3YN??dp?_
?Q?dpy????????????7
???1??R???s??????N?? ??-]???4???e???5?<??C??}?????
??/???
?N???7??{U?
5??7f?)o?????
???PKQX?4??`h?Q ??ti_dsp_11169.patchPKx?[3????c ??5speex_config_types.hPK??
2006 Apr 19
2
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be
> doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As
> it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May
> (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken.
Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all
occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)