search for: patchkit

So it's gotten a bit confusing to figure out how we should go about upstreaming the rest of our patches. Our patchkit in the paravirt-ops tree currently applies to 2.6.19-rc4-mm2, but there are a number of conflicts that got resolved when merging into Andi's i386 tree. What is the best way to sanitize the remaining patches so they smoothly integrate into the appropriate trees? Should we rebase to Andi'...

So it's gotten a bit confusing to figure out how we should go about upstreaming the rest of our patches. Our patchkit in the paravirt-ops tree currently applies to 2.6.19-rc4-mm2, but there are a number of conflicts that got resolved when merging into Andi's i386 tree. What is the best way to sanitize the remaining patches so they smoothly integrate into the appropriate trees? Should we rebase to Andi'...

...Version: -current Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: weberc at grc.nia.nih.gov Server OS Tru64 5.1a current patchkit, (march or may 02 depending on box) using LDAP authentication module for Tru64 IAELDAM570 or 580. Using openssh 2.9x and 3.3x my users with LDAP accounts could log in via ssh. Using 3.4p1, the users will get the error "cannot set login uid 1000: error Not owner." The root user with a pa...

Hello users, I'm new to this list, so forgive me if this has been diskussed before. I'm trying to compile samba 2.2.5 on a Alpha box with Tru64UNIX v4.0f patchkit 6. configure went ok. While running (gnu)make I get a warning. I do not exactly know what this means and want to clarify what to do. The config line is: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/opt/samba --exec-prefix=/usr/local \ --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/log/samba \...

...under Compaq's compiler, although according to someone from the comp.security.ssh newsgroup: : We had a similar problem at 5.0A, and solved by installing the latest : compiler version, available at http://tru64unix.compaq.com/tools.html : : I believe I also saw the claim that the most recent patchkit : solved the problem. http://www.support.compaq.com/patches/index.html : for that. I haven't had a chance to test this yet. It compiled fine with gcc 2.7.2.3 - I would have used 2.95.x, but that doesn't compile cleanly on the machine, and I didn't bother compiling 2.95.x with gcc2.7.2...

I've parsed a whole year's worth of postings in this group and didn't find any previous reference to the problem. Since I've updated McAfee to version 8 many applications which open file chooser dialogs report "Access denied" when trying to open a Samba share, including the users's own home directory. At installation one can choose to exclude some apps from the

OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two

OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a nightmare 8( Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch This patch undoes those two

I did some btrfs RTFS over the weeking and I have a hard time understanding what this code is attempting to do: 28 int btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb) 29 { 30 int i; 31 32 if (mutex_trylock(&eb->mutex)) 33 return 0; 34 for (i = 0; i < 512; i++) { 35 cpu_relax(); 36 if

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to