search for: patchings

Please CC me on answer, as I'm not subscribed on the list Here is the description of the problem. The system description follows. Everytime I read my email using KMail 3.5.6, dovecot hangs up near the end. I get the following in mail.err: IMAP(doudou): file ostream-crlf.c: line 339 (_send_istream): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret <= iov.iov_len) IMAP(doudou): Raw backtrace: imap

hi guys can anyone give me info how to patch postfix with VDA? im using centos 4 with postfix-2.1.5-4.2. I downloaded the postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4.src.rpm to recompile it with VDA. i also downloaded the patch for postfix to support VDA. i added a line in postfix.spec Patch8: postfix-2.1.5-trash.patch for the VDA. but when i compiled it it seems that it doesn't compile with the given patch

Hello all, I've been trying to compile metamail on Centos4.2. But no luck so far. rpmbuild --rebuild metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Installing metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96604 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf mm2.7 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/mm2.7.tar.Z + tar

Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have

On 16 November 2016 at 15:52, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > I will do a quick benchmark run. On a mac pro (running linux) the results I got with all cores available: firefox master 7.146418217 patch 5.304271767 1.34729488437x faster firefox-gc master 7.316743822 patch 5.46436812 1.33899174824x faster chromium master 4.265597914 patch

Hallo short question how is the Syntax for interactivity.patch ext3-dir-speedup.patch ? patch -p0 ext3-dir-speedup.patch doesnt work -- Frank

Hy, I have currently a big problem with Win95 clients generating files with invalid inode types. This only happens with Quark documents created from scratch. Example: ?rwxrwxrwt 1 falkenbe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:02 /vol04/pc_03/Deerberg/ctp_Deerberg/test07 after copying the file it really is a file !! -rwxrwxrwx 1 schoenhe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:00

SHA1 in LLVM is *very* naive, any improvement is welcome there! It think Amaury pointed it originally and he had an alternative implementation IIRC. — Mehdi > On Nov 16, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > By the way, while running benchmark, I found that our SHA1 function seems much slower than the one in gold. gold slowed down by

Lo, Is there already a patch out for latest 2.4.6-ac release? I'm pretty sure that the ext3 patch -ac2 can not be applied on this release. Bye. -- the trees the birds the air the grass the water the flies the trees

To get BSM working on Solaris 8 with OpenSSH, I did this: Download John R. Jackson's OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch here, and save as "patch.tar.gz": http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 (NOTE TO OpenSSH DEVELOPERS, can you incorporate this patch into the next version of OpenSSH?) Installing the OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch: ?-------------------------------------- Turning on Sun BSM

Hi, I'm having trouble applying ebtables-brnf-3_vs_2.4.22.diff to 2.4.22-1.2166.nptl. Applying the patch did not go well. Can anyone help me with this? TIA. Andy Here is the output: [root@specwall linux-2.4.22-1.2166.nptl]# patch -p1 < ../ebtables-brnf-3_vs_2.4.22.diff patching file net/bridge/br_private.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway?

hello, i have a problem to patch wine. it's about this bug : http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13335, and concerning mmap.patch. here is the command line that i tried : patch -p1 < mmap.patch but here is the result : Code: teddy at tedportable:~/wine/wine-1.1.18$ patch -p1 < mmap.patch patching file dlls/ntdll/ntdll_misc.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 139. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving

The current implementation was “copy/pasted” from somewhere (it was explicitly public domain). > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Can we just copy-and-paste optimized code from somewhere? > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > SHA1 in LLVM is

Hi ! Is a ext3 patch for kernel 2.4.14pre7 available ? Patching 2.4.14pre7 with latest patch ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p5 fails: patching file include/linux/sched.h Hunk #2 succeeded at 489 (offset 1 line). patching file include/linux/fs.h patching file include/linux/capability.h patching file fs/buffer.c patching file mm/filemap.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 209 (offset 4 lines). patching file mm/vmscan.c

Le 08/07/2015 17:36, Richard Mudgett a ?crit : > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Administrator TOOTAI <admin at tootai.net > <mailto:admin at tootai.net>> wrote: > > Hi list, > > we wanted to patch our servers with 11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 > actual running version. Patch failed with > > zone-s:/usr/src/asterisk-11.18.0# patch

Hi @all, I cannot use this patch in 2.2.5. I patched the source before with parse_sec.patch ldap_start_tls.patch Makefile.in.patch srv_spoolss_nt.patch addform.diff Containes the samba-2.2.5-printing.patch only parts of the above patches? tom

On 01.07.2015 17:46, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> On 01.07.2015 12:10, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:35 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> To remind you once again. >>>> ISOLINUX >= 6.00 built with GCC >= 5.0.0 causes a broken boot. >>>> This relates specifically to the use of the

Hi list, we wanted to patch our servers with 11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 actual running version. Patch failed with zone-s:/usr/src/asterisk-11.18.0# patch --dry-run -p0 < ../asterisk-11.18.0-patch can't find file to patch at input line 5 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff --git a/.version b/.version |index

hi, For compiz ubuntu packages, I made some patchs to have a behavior of compiz nearer to metacity. All patch are made for compiz-0.3.6 and they are more hacks or draft than good fix, i hope they can help. http://gandalfn.club.fr/ubuntu/compiz-patch/90-fix-no-border-window-shadow.patch This patch fix white boxes instead of shadows for gnome-panel and other non-standard windows on AiGLX.

I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other