search for: patchfiles

...=========== > >This appears to be the result of a bug introduced into the linux_base >port in PORTREVISION 7.1_2. linux_base-7.1 originally installed the >RedHat 7.1 libstdc++ RPM (libstdc++-2.96-81.i386.rpm) as a PATCHFILE. >In Revision 1.64 of the Makefile the logic to install the PATCHFILES was >removed. In the same commit the libstdc++ RPM was moved from the >PATCHFILES to the DISTFILES and so no problem manifested at that time. >Revision 1.69 of ports/emulators/linux_base/Makefile upgraded the >libstdc++ RPM to the RedHat 7.1 update package >(libstdc++-2.96-112.7.1.i...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=521 Summary: [patch] - some changes to runme script Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

On 24/01/2018 7:04 PM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > You need to create a branch from the original master, if you do > git log master > then you'll see which commit that is: f735449d679686867e7d3ab70810b09e8cea6366 > > So create that branch off that and switch to the new branch: > git branch keepclassx f735449d679686867e7d3ab70810b09e8cea6366 > git checkout keepclassx > >

Hi folks, I've updated LLVM-py to work with the latest LLVM. The patch is available here: http://code.google.com/p/llvm-py/issues/detail?id=25 The patch can be applied with the command: patch -p0 < patchfile Warm Regards KS Sreeram

Hi, as seen the Eve online support improved in the last time. The problem with that is that these things are only workarounds atm. So the next step should be that these hacks get improved so they can become real patches which are accepted by AJ. The current patchfile can be found at http://elfe.mine.nu/eve/linux/ So basicly some facts about the current EVE status:

I would like to have sync'd Unix and Samba passwords. My Unix passwords are stored in OpenLDAP for uniformity across machines and services. I have some problems with the standard solutions to this problem though: * if I have Samba authenticate from OpenLDAP directly (using the smbPassword attribute), then I get sync'ing problems when the password is changed via normal Unix means. We

From bugtraq :-( >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >Sendmail, Inc., and the Sendmail Consortium announce the availability >of sendmail 8.12.9. It contains a fix for a critical security >problem discovered by Michal Zalewski whom we thank for bringing >this problem to our attention. Sendmail urges all users to either >upgrade to sendmail 8.12.9 or apply a patch for

On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:04 PM, KS Sreeram wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've updated LLVM-py to work with the latest LLVM. > > The patch is available here: > http://code.google.com/p/llvm-py/issues/detail?id=25 > > The patch can be applied with the command: > patch -p0 < patchfile Very nice, but llvm-py is not in the llvm.org svn repo, you'll likely to have to

On 24/01/2018 7:29 PM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> Thanks, those instructions appear to have worked. >> >> For comparison purposes, the equivalent steps in svn would be >> >> svn diff -r PREV:HEAD --internal-diff > patchfile >> >> and then the

On 7/14/23 09:41, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > On 7/14/23 07:42, Daniel M?ller wrote: >> Where to get the patch? >> We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. > > it's linked in the bugreport > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418 > >

Has anyone managed to add the bristuff patch to 1.2.7.1 successfully? My attempts has ended up bad, so if anyone has a working patchfile for 1.2.7.1 I would be grateful to receive it. Thanks, Vidar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060430/1c56d94e/attachment.htm

Hello all. I sent a message to Jerry and the list, I see it didn't appear, must have made an error. Maybe that's good, I shouldn't hassle Jerry about minor stuff. I've never applied a patch. What does it entail, I'm sure being a rocket scientist isn't part of it? I been to the site and seen the patches, they look like scripts that can be run, is this the case? How?

Could someone please search and replace the msvc projectfile for oggenc: "c:\src" -> "..\.." I tried to make a patchfile but I dont know if I got it right... /Erik <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>TEXT/PLAIN attachment: oggenc.dsp.diff </UL> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: oggenc.dsp.diff Type:

...rkupstools/nut/commit/b608975b55895e853ba8d24fc08761bff2c65940 Patch: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/compare/macosx_power_dict.diff I don't use MacPorts much, but I think this is how you would add this patch to the NUT portfile: https://guide.macports.org/#development.patches.source patchfiles macosx_power_dict.diff patch.pre_args -p1 -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail

...dir is used, but $pkglibexecdir. And $pkglibexecdir is always defined as $libexecdir/dovecot. But I don't want this trailing "/dovecot". Same with localstatedir. I want dovecot to use a certain path. But to this path, a "run/dovecot" is appended. I surely could build some patchfiles to change the Makefiles. But it would be easier, if you could add a new directive --pgklibexecdir to the configure-script. I don't know where the "run/dovecot" is defined, but it would also be very fine to set it in the configure-script (specially when upgrading to new releases) in...

Hi, I've tried to compile syslinux under mandriva, and the compilation always bails out because it hasn't created win32/syslinux.exe. As far as I understand, the build will work fine on a Windows / mingw installation, but not Linux. I've modified my Makefile to remove the win32/syslinux.exe from the build, and it now builds OK. This happened on 3.3.6 and also on 4.0pre.

I investigated the rsync code and found the reason why. For every file in the source, it searches the entire filter-list looking to see if that filename is on the exclude/include list. Most aren't, so it compares (350K - 72K) * 72K names (the non-listed files) plus (72K * 72K/2) names (the ones that are listed), for a total of about 22,608,000,000 strcmp's. That's 22 BILLION

Quoting Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > I 'think' you are meant to patch Samba, then totally recompile it > i.e. ./configure && make && make install, then run samba-tool. I did that git clone https://git.samba.org/samba.git cd samba/ yum install gcc libacl-devel python-devel gnutls-devel openldap-devel ./configure make

Hello, I have been looking to submit a patch to RSpec, and I wanted to go about it the right way, so I loaded up http://rspec.rubyforge.org/contribute.html. The author of this page suggests that one should download from trunk to make any patches. It would be great if this section also included a url to the trunk. -Chris

...cial order but I am not really experienced in this. I also compiled a version with only the fileflags.diff and rtimes.diff (I took this from the macports Portfile. This works, but the resulting binary also recopies many files instead of creating the hardlinks. My questions: 1. How can I apply all patchfiles from the patches directory? 2. Can I expect that the creation of hardlinks on external drives then will work? 3. What else could I do to make it work? Thanks in advance and best regards Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.or...