search for: patches

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 89621 matches for "patches".

2007 Jul 23
2
assertion failed with KMail 3.5.6 and dovecot 1.0.0
Please CC me on answer, as I'm not subscribed on the list Here is the description of the problem. The system description follows. Everytime I read my email using KMail 3.5.6, dovecot hangs up near the end. I get the following in mail.err: IMAP(doudou): file ostream-crlf.c: line 339 (_send_istream): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret <= iov.iov_len) IMAP(doudou): Raw backtrace: imap
2005 Aug 01
1
patching postfix with VDA
hi guys can anyone give me info how to patch postfix with VDA? im using centos 4 with postfix-2.1.5-4.2. I downloaded the postfix-2.1.5-4.2.RHEL4.src.rpm to recompile it with VDA. i also downloaded the patch for postfix to support VDA. i added a line in postfix.spec Patch8: postfix-2.1.5-trash.patch for the VDA. but when i compiled it it seems that it doesn't compile with the given patch
2006 Apr 03
1
Cannot compile metamail
Hello all, I've been trying to compile metamail on Centos4.2. But no luck so far. rpmbuild --rebuild metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Installing metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96604 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf mm2.7 +
2007 Dec 09
8
zpool kernel panics.
Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have
2016 Nov 16
3
LLD: time to enable --threads by default
On 16 November 2016 at 15:52, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > I will do a quick benchmark run. On a mac pro (running linux) the results I got with all cores available: firefox master 7.146418217 patch 5.304271767 1.34729488437x faster firefox-gc master 7.316743822 patch 5.46436812 1.33899174824x faster chromium master 4.265597914 patch
2001 Sep 08
5
Patch
Hallo short question how is the Syntax for interactivity.patch ext3-dir-speedup.patch ? patch -p0 ext3-dir-speedup.patch doesnt work -- Frank
1999 Jul 29
0
Strange problem with samba 1.9.18p10 on Solaris 2.6
Hy, I have currently a big problem with Win95 clients generating files with invalid inode types. This only happens with Quark documents created from scratch. Example: ?rwxrwxrwt 1 falkenbe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:02 /vol04/pc_03/Deerberg/ctp_Deerberg/test07 after copying the file it really is a file !! -rwxrwxrwx 1 schoenhe av 35638891 Jul 29 16:00
2016 Nov 17
3
LLD: time to enable --threads by default
SHA1 in LLVM is *very* naive, any improvement is welcome there! It think Amaury pointed it originally and he had an alternative implementation IIRC. — Mehdi > On Nov 16, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > By the way, while running benchmark, I found that our SHA1 function seems much slower than the one in gold. gold slowed down by
2001 Jul 18
2
Patch for latest ac release?
Lo, Is there already a patch out for latest 2.4.6-ac release? I'm pretty sure that the ext3 patch -ac2 can not be applied on this release. Bye. -- the trees the birds the air the grass the water the flies the trees
2003 Jan 03
1
OpenSSH, Solaris 8, and BSM works with BSM patch, but must disable privilege separation
To get BSM working on Solaris 8 with OpenSSH, I did this: Download John R. Jackson's OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch here, and save as "patch.tar.gz": http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 (NOTE TO OpenSSH DEVELOPERS, can you incorporate this patch into the next version of OpenSSH?) Installing the OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch: ?--------------------------------------
2009 May 24
3
need help to compile wine with patches
hello, i have a problem to patch wine. it's about this bug : http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13335, and concerning mmap.patch. here is the command line that i tried : patch -p1 < mmap.patch but here is the result : Code: teddy at tedportable:~/wine/wine-1.1.18$ patch -p1 < mmap.patch patching file dlls/ntdll/ntdll_misc.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 139. 1 out
2016 Nov 17
2
LLD: time to enable --threads by default
The current implementation was “copy/pasted” from somewhere (it was explicitly public domain). > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Can we just copy-and-paste optimized code from somewhere? > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > SHA1 in
2015 Jul 08
2
11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 running version failed to apply
Le 08/07/2015 17:36, Richard Mudgett a ?crit : > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Administrator TOOTAI <admin at tootai.net > <mailto:admin at tootai.net>> wrote: > > Hi list, > > we wanted to patch our servers with 11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 > actual running version. Patch failed with > >
2001 Nov 03
1
Patch for kernel 2.4.14pre7
Hi ! Is a ext3 patch for kernel 2.4.14pre7 available ? Patching 2.4.14pre7 with latest patch ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p5 fails: patching file include/linux/sched.h Hunk #2 succeeded at 489 (offset 1 line). patching file include/linux/fs.h patching file include/linux/capability.h patching file fs/buffer.c patching file mm/filemap.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 209 (offset 4
2015 Jul 02
1
boot... round 2
..."syslinux-6.04-pre1" yet (and there are several reasons not to release such thing > yet, IMHO, but I could understand the reasoning from those that would disagree with > me). > > I am sure more than one of us are thankful for the tests, feedback, reports and > suggested patches, but at this point I cannot be sure what exactly has been > failing. > > There has been no %100-clear statement identifying which part of Syslinux was > failing: > > _ isolinux.bin (alone)? > _ isolinux-debug.bin (alone)? > _ Is syslinux.sys failing (too)? > _ Is the...
2007 Apr 18
1
paravirt patches in -mm
Guys, could you please confirm that these patches from -mm: paravirt-remove-read-hazard-from-cow.patch paravirt-pte-clear-not-present.patch paravirt-lazy-mmu-mode-hooks.patch paravirt-combine-flush-accessed-dirty.patch paravirt-kpte-flush.patch paravirt-optimize-ptep-establish-for-pae.patch paravirt-remove-set-pte-atomic.patch paravirt-pae-compil...
2015 Jul 08
2
11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 running version failed to apply
Hi list, we wanted to patch our servers with 11.18.0 patch against 11.17.0 actual running version. Patch failed with zone-s:/usr/src/asterisk-11.18.0# patch --dry-run -p0 < ../asterisk-11.18.0-patch can't find file to patch at input line 5 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff --git
2012 May 21
13
ATI ES100 patch
Hello, I want to apply this patch: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Linux_3.0_bugs_impacting_Xen#32-bit_graphic_cards_.28AGP.2C_or_server_ones:_ATI_ES1000.29_can.27t_do_Xorg I downloaded the patch from: http://darnok.org/xen/vga.patch and I did this to apply it: patch < vga.patch It asks for a file to patch, and it may be obvious, but I don''t know which
2008 Mar 16
3
NV50: More patches to test
This is primarily targeted at Koala_BR, but if someone happens to have a a fully working nouveay g80 setup, then go ahead. Maarten. (this is attempt 2, as 100 KiB seems to be the maximum allowed size) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-NV50-Merge-crtc-creation.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2751 bytes Desc: not available Url :
2017 Feb 25
2
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...be-book-support.patch >> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch >> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch >> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch >> %endif >> >> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included >> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos. >> >> My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have >> the %if macro where the patch is applied, but should not be where the >> source for the patch is def...