Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "patch_work".
Did you mean:
patchwork
2020 Apr 08
0
[RFC PATCH 15/26] x86/alternatives: Non-emulated text poking
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:03:12PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> +static int __maybe_unused text_poke_late(patch_worker_t worker, void *stage)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
> +
> + if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + text_poke_state.stage = stage;
> + text_poke_state.num_acks = cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask);
> + text_...
2020 Apr 08
0
[RFC PATCH 19/26] x86/alternatives: NMI safe runtime patching
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:03:16PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> @@ -1807,12 +1911,20 @@ static int __maybe_unused text_poke_late(patch_worker_t worker, void *stage)
> text_poke_state.state = PATCH_SYNC_DONE; /* Start state */
> text_poke_state.primary_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> + text_poke_state.nmi_context = nmi;
> +
> + if (nmi)
> + register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, text_poke_nmi,
> + NMI_FLAG_...