search for: patch_fil

...st. In my opinion ForceCommand should not be considered when subsystem is activated. I have made a patch (please see attached file) it will probably solve the problem. Best Regareds Wojak -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: patch_file Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20071220/d2c0865d/attachment.ksh

...H Header", "name" : "PCH Name", "output": "PCH Output name" } ] }, "projects" : [ { "name" : "NAME", "archive": "ARCHIVE", **I believe only zip/.tar.gz are supported now, "patch_files" : [ "Patch 1 to apply to project", "Patch 2 to apply to project"], "build_info" : { "style" : "make", "target" : "MAKE RULE" (i.e. all/etc), "file": "PATH TO UNZIPPED DIRECTORY" **(i.e....

Hello Arno, Can apply the patch directly or should I recompile nut? Best regards, Panagiotis On 3/4/2015 5:06 ??, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Hello Panagiotis > > 2015-04-03 14:28 GMT+02:00 Panagiotis Kritikakos > <panagiotis.kritikakos at nikitec.gr > <mailto:panagiotis.kritikakos at nikitec.gr>>: > > Hello Arno, > > Question: have you also

Hi, I was looking at LNT's "compile" tests, listed here: $ lnt-sandbox/bin/lnt showtests Available tests: compile - Single file compile-time performance testing nt - LLVM test-suite compile and execution tests When trying to run it, I get Python exceptions in the code trying to parse the output of 'ifconfig' in order to infer my MAC address (this is on 64-bit

...kitec.gr>: > Hello Arno, > > Can apply the patch directly or should I recompile nut? > not sure to fully understand your comment, but... this is a source code patch, so you indeed have to apply it to the NUT source code (from within the source tree, "patch -p1 < ../path/to/patch_file), and then recompile (make, at least, or configure). note that the configure flags should be adapted to your specific distro to ensure easier testing. not sure about FreeNas ones, but that can be found in their package repos. cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader NUT...

...pport what I think is an absolutely needed feature in order to make rsync-based backups retaining complete ownership permission when writing to an opensolaris machine using --fake-super. My goal is making backups of linux boxes to opensolaris/zfs. In order to make it work just do patch -p1 < patch_file.txt inside rsync source tree. and set #define SUPPORT_XATTRS 1 in config.h I tested the patch with rsync 3.0.6 and the last git commit. Disclaimer: 1) I'm not a filesystem programmer 2) the patch is surely full of nasty bugs and could be insecure/break your systems. etc etc. 3) even...

...o, > > Can apply the patch directly or should I recompile nut? > > > not sure to fully understand your comment, but... > this is a source code patch, so you indeed have to apply it to the NUT > source code (from within the source tree, "patch -p1 < > ../path/to/patch_file), and then recompile (make, at least, or configure). > note that the configure flags should be adapted to your specific > distro to ensure easier testing. > not sure about FreeNas ones, but that can be found in their package repos. > > cheers, > Arno > -- > Eaton Data Cen...

Found 15 patches (out of 162) that appeared relevant to ocfs2 1.4. Please review. Sunil