Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "patch503".
Did you mean:
patch2503
2017 Feb 25
3
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692
The source RPM there uses
%if 0%{?rhel}
# not upstreamed
Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch
Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch
Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch
%endif
(and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included
in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos.
My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have
the %if macro where the patch is applied, but...
2017 Feb 25
2
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...;> The source RPM there uses
>>
>> %if 0%{?rhel}
>> # not upstreamed
>> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch
>> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
>> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch
>> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch
>> %endif
>>
>> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included
>> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos.
>>
>> My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to h...
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...ldinfo?buildID=861692
>
> The source RPM there uses
>
> %if 0%{?rhel}
> # not upstreamed
> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch
> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch
> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch
> %endif
>
> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included
> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos.
>
> My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have
> the %if macro...
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...ses
>>>
>>> %if 0%{?rhel}
>>> # not upstreamed
>>> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch
>>> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
>>> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch
>>> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch
>>> %endif
>>>
>>> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included
>>> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos.
>>>
>>> My understanding was that platform specific p...
2012 May 29
4
per-mailbox message limits
....cf.%{__distinit}%{__distvers}
+%global dovecot_release %{?prerel:0.}2.0%{?prerel:.%{prerel}}.cf.MSSL.%{__distinit}%{__distvers}
%global sieve_epoch 3
%global sieve_version 0.3.0
%global sieve_release 6.1.cf.%{__distinit}%{__distvers}
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
Patch502: dovecot-2.0-mysqlconfig.patch
Patch503: dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-bzip2.patch
Patch504: dovecot-2.1.rc6-fallocate64.patch
+Patch505: ../../dovecot-mssl-2.1.6.mail-storage.c.DIFF
BuildRequires: gcc-c++
BuildRequires: openssl-devel, pam-devel, zlib-devel, bzip2-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel, krb5-devel >= 1.3
@@ -282,6 +283,11 @...