search for: patch503

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "patch503".

Did you mean: patch502
2017 Feb 25
3
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...;/koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 The source RPM there uses %if 0%{?rhel} # not upstreamed Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch %endif (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos. My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have the %if macro where the patch is applied,...
2017 Feb 25
2
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...;> The source RPM there uses >> >> %if 0%{?rhel} >> # not upstreamed >> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch >> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch >> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch >> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch >> %endif >> >> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included >> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos. >> >> My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose...
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...ldinfo?buildID=861692 > > The source RPM there uses > > %if 0%{?rhel} > # not upstreamed > Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch > Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch > Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch > Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch > %endif > > (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included > in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos. > > My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have > the %if m...
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
...ses >>> >>> %if 0%{?rhel} >>> # not upstreamed >>> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch >>> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch >>> Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch >>> Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch >>> %endif >>> >>> (and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included >>> in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos. >>> >>> My understanding was that platform specif...
2012 May 29
4
per-mailbox message limits
....cf.%{__distinit}%{__distvers} +%global dovecot_release %{?prerel:0.}2.0%{?prerel:.%{prerel}}.cf.MSSL.%{__distinit}%{__distvers} %global sieve_epoch 3 %global sieve_version 0.3.0 %global sieve_release 6.1.cf.%{__distinit}%{__distvers} @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ Patch502: dovecot-2.0-mysqlconfig.patch Patch503: dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-bzip2.patch Patch504: dovecot-2.1.rc6-fallocate64.patch +Patch505: ../../dovecot-mssl-2.1.6.mail-storage.c.DIFF BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: openssl-devel, pam-devel, zlib-devel, bzip2-devel BuildRequires: openldap-devel, krb5-devel >= 1.3 @@ -282,6 +...