Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "patch100".
Did you mean:
patch10
2015 Apr 23
2
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
...oy samba in an environment where
you use Samba as a member server with Windows Domain Controllers, you
may be unable to authenticate users who are not part of your kerberos
domain with the current samba package (4.1.12-21.el7_1).
If a fix is necessary, you can recompile the source RPM with the
patch100 and patch101 commented out in the SPEC file. At least for us,
it seems to be working fine. (YMMV)
2015 Apr 27
0
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
...ent where you use Samba as a member server with Windows Domain
> Controllers, you may be unable to authenticate users who are not part
> of your kerberos domain with the current samba package (4.1.12-21.el7_1).
>
> If a fix is necessary, you can recompile the source RPM with the
> patch100 and patch101 commented out in the SPEC file. At least for us,
> it seems to be working fine. (YMMV)
>
>
Did you figure out who/where to submit a bug report to? Or find any more
info? I just upgraded my Centos boxes and my Samba shares are now
broken. I believe I was running samba-4.1.1...
2015 Apr 21
2
Samba 4.1 as member server, problems doing password authentication using CentOS/RedHat 7 packages
On 04/20/2015 05:30 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Ty! Boyack!
Thanks, and Hi!
> I dumped (using testparm -v) all of the default settings, and found that
> With Samba 4, I've found the output of "samba-tool testparm" to be different
> from "testparm". The former looks more trustworthy to me.
I feel really foolish here -- but I don't see samba-tool as