search for: passsupport

...1st PassInfo (this=0x2aaaac3472a0, name=0x2aaaabe24421 "Target Data Layout", arg=0x2aaaabe24434 "targetdata", pi=17004736, normal=0xada74e <llvm::Pass* llvm::callDefaultCtor<llvm::TargetData>()>, isCFGOnly=false, is_analysis=true) at /home/xliu/dev/llvm/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:59 (gdb) bt #0 PassInfo (this=0x2aaaac3472a0, name=0x2aaaabe24421 "Target Data Layout", arg=0x2aaaabe24434 "targetdata", pi=17004736, normal=0xada74e <llvm::Pass* llvm::callDefaultCtor<llvm::TargetData>()>, isCFGOnly=false, is_analysis=true) at /home/xliu/dev/llvm...

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could you please rig Makefile.rules or something to print out the value > >> of $(LLVM_ON_WIN32) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > >> that's erroneously false. > > This works for me: > > Index: Makefile.rules >

...e to `llvm::FunctionPass::runOnModule(l lvm::Module&)' /usr/build/llvm-65633/lib/Transforms/Hello/Debug/Hello.o: In function `_ZN4llvm1 2RegisterPassIN79_GLOBAL__N__usr_src_llvm_65633_lib_Transforms_Hello_Hello.cpp_0 0000000_965F4EBD5HelloEEC1EPKcS5_bb': /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined reference to `llvm ::Pass::getPassName() const' /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined reference to `llvm ::Pass::print(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, llvm::Module c onst*) const' /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/P...

Hi, I'm confused about the is_analysis parameter of the RegisterPass constructor (defined in PassSupport.h). The only explanation I can find is that is_analysis should be set to true if the pass is "an analysis pass, for example dominator tree pass". Can someone please clarify what is meant by "analysis pass"? Also -- and this is more of a C++ question than an LLVM question...

...Pass::runOnModule(l lvm::Module&)' /usr/build/llvm-65633/lib/Transforms/Hello/Debug/Hello.o: In function `_ZN4llvm1 2RegisterPassIN79_GLOBAL__N__usr_src_llvm_65633_lib_Transforms_Hello_Hello.cpp_0 0000000_965F4EBD5HelloEEC1EPKcS5_bb': /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined reference to `llvm ::Pass::getPassName() const' /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined reference to `llvm ::Pass::print(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, llvm::Module c onst*) const' /usr/src/llvm-...

...t; /usr/build/llvm-65633/lib/Transforms/Hello/Debug/Hello.o: In > function `_ZN4llvm1 > 2RegisterPassIN79_GLOBAL__N__usr_src_llvm_65633_lib_Transforms_Hello_Hello.cpp_0 > 0000000_965F4EBD5HelloEEC1EPKcS5_bb': > /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined > reference to `llvm > ::Pass::getPassName() const' > /usr/src/llvm-65633/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:172: undefined > reference to `llvm > ::Pass::print(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >...

...my pass. By looking at -dot-callgraph source, I've tried something like this: CallGraphWrapperPass *CGWP = new CallGraphWrapperPass(); PM.add(CGWP); CallGraph *CG = &CGWP->getCallGraph(); PM.add(new MyPass(CG)); I get the following error: /home/riyad/installs/llvm-3.7.0/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:95:38: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'MyPass' Pass *callDefaultCtor() { return new PassName(); } My guess is pass manager needs pass with default constructor. Is there any easy way to get instance of call graph in my pass? Thanks in Advance, Riyad ---------...

...: In file included from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:17:0, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:18, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/PassRegistry.h:20, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:25, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/Pass.h:366, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/PassManager.h:20, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/Support/StandardPasses.h:22, from /waflhome/trapni/local/src/flow/src/Ru...

...one, relatively inconsistently. What i’ve gone for is that if a class already had an inline destructor then i left it alone and added an anchor method. Otherwise I added an out of line destructor. Now if I compile Instructions.cpp with -Wweak-vtable, the only warnings given are: ../include/llvm/PassSupport.h:226:8: warning: 'PassRegistrationListener' has no out-of-line virtual method definitions; its vtable will be emitted in every translation unit [-Wweak-vtables] struct PassRegistrationListener { ^ In file included from ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:16: In file included from ../li...

...LLVM trunk I noticed that the line "_passManager.add(llvm::createTailDuplicationPass());" in my code fails with the following assertion: Assertion failed: NormalCtor && "Cannot call createPass on PassInfo without default ctor!", file D:\Workspace\llvmtrunk\include\llvm/PassSupport.h, line 111 This behavior was introduced in revision 89904: Both, lib/CodeGen/tailDuplication.cpp and lib/Transforms/TailDuplication.cpp export a function with the signature llvm::createTailDuplicationPass(). In my case the linker picks the wrong one - the CodeGen version instead of the Transforms...

On Thursday 25 February 2010 19:24:30 Trevor Harmon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm confused about the is_analysis parameter of the RegisterPass > constructor (defined in PassSupport.h). The only explanation I can > find is that is_analysis should be set to true if the pass is "an > analysis pass, for example dominator tree pass". Can someone please > clarify what is meant by "analysis pass"? I don't have the sources at my fingertips but my exp...

...ot;Live Variable Analysis", false, false); in the llvm/lib/codegen/LiveVariables.cpp, where LiveVariables is a subclass of MachineFunctionPass, and #define INITIALIZE_PASS(passName, arg, name, cfg, analysis) \ static RegisterPass<passName> passName ## _info(arg, name, cfg, analysis) in PassSupport.h Is this code used to register and initialize a pass? This kind of registration is just the way illustrated in the hello example at http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#registration. My problem is: I wrote a pass (Mypass), also a subclass of MachineFunctionPass. And I wrote the similar s...

...erer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp:72: warning: passing negative value `-0x000000001' for converting 2 of `bool llvm::AliasSetTracker::add(llvm::Value*, unsigned int)' Compiling LoopExtractor.cpp /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/PassSupport.h: In function `llvm::Pass* llvm::callDefaultCtor() [with PassName = <unnamed>::LoopExtractor]': /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:209: instantiated from `llvm::RegisterOpt<PassName>::RegisterOpt(const char*, const char*, bool) [with PassName = &l...

...ile caching_compiler_test [.] (anonymous namespace)::VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(llvm::SDValue) + 0.47% caching_compile caching_compiler_test [.] llvm::PMDataManager::findAnalysisPass(void const*, bool) -------------- next part -------------- diff --git a/llvm/llvm.svnrev.170375/include/llvm/PassSupport.h b/llvm/llvm.svnrev.170375/include/llvm/PassSupport.h index 3633f47..44b4d56 100644 --- a/llvm/llvm.svnrev.170375/include/llvm/PassSupport.h +++ b/llvm/llvm.svnrev.170375/include/llvm/PassSupport.h @@ -130,25 +130,14 @@ private: PassInfo(const PassInfo &) LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION; }; + + #...

LLVM build without big problems in obj dir == src dir case (for example, last night tester build) But I have problem with building CVS version LLVM in obj dir != src dir case. ======= Finished building ModuleMaker debug executable (without symbols) ======= gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/examples/ModuleMaker' gmake[1]: Leaving directory

...to this with anchor’s. Anyone got a strong opinion which is best, especially as I don’t want to do anything too big for 3.7 at this point. Cheers, Pete > > - Dave > > > Now if I compile Instructions.cpp with -Wweak-vtable, the only warnings given are: > > ../include/llvm/PassSupport.h:226:8: warning: 'PassRegistrationListener' has no out-of-line virtual method definitions; > its vtable will be emitted in every translation unit [-Wweak-vtables] > struct PassRegistrationListener { > ^ > In file included from ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:16: > In...

...lvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DeadStoreElimination.cpp:72: > warning: passing negative value `-0x000000001' for converting 2 of `bool > llvm::AliasSetTracker::add(llvm::Value*, unsigned int)' > > Compiling LoopExtractor.cpp > /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/PassSupport.h: In > function `llvm::Pass* llvm::callDefaultCtor() [with PassName = > <unnamed>::LoopExtractor]': > /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:209: > instantiated from `llvm::RegisterOpt<PassName>::RegisterOpt(const char*, > const char*,...

...tion), does that then make Andersen's the new default alias analysis so that passes that declare a dependence on AliasAnalysis will now get Andersen's instead of basicaa? Or do I really have to put -andersaa after every option that could invalidate alias analysis? >From the comments in PassSupport.h, it sounds like the former is true. Andersen's would be "available" and thus used. However, what happens when alias analysis information gets invalidated? Is Andersen's still "available" in the sense analysis groups use it? If not, it seems it would be tough to mak...

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:04 PM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > [Ooops, sent to the old list address by mistake] > > > > On 30 Jul 2015, at 21:04, tom at stellard.net wrote: > >> > >> For flags like

...found usage ------------------- check analysis --------Required set ---------- Machine Function Analysis -------- end ---------- ---------- finding... Machine Function Analysis -------------------------------- Oh no no analysis pass test: /home/elhigu/stow_sources/llvm-2.6-svn/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:111: llvm::Pass* llvm::PassInfo::createPass() const: Assertion `NormalCtor && "Cannot call createPass on PassInfo without default ctor!"' failed. Aborted When I tried to compile the same file with llc Machine Function Analysis pass was created with out problems. Am I mis...