search for: passively

Hi Renato, This patch is to add Xenoprof passive domain support in SMP environment. Basically: - It allocates per vcpu buffers for passive domain and maps them into primary domain''s space. - When primary domain gets sampled and triggers virq, its kernel module will handle passive domain'' samples besides its owns. There is potential buffer overflow if passive is very busy while

When I combine separate vectors into one list, there are new names created. I'd like to change them to something more meaningful. Here are two examples using data(zelazo) from library(ISwR): > library(ISwR) > data(zelazo) > attach(zelazo) > zelazo $active [1] 9.00 9.50 9.75 10.00 13.00 9.50 $passive [1] 11.00 10.00 10.00 11.75 10.50 15.00 $none [1] 11.50 12.00 9.00

Hello, I am trying to test some results I have for significance. It has been recommended that I use R and I am completely new to this. Set-up: Groups: two groups of 8 subjects (16 total) Two conditions: alert and passive Measurements: responses for three different stimuli (A, B, and C) measured in each condition Experiment: Testing the order of conditions Group one: Alert A, B

it''s a good idea to do this: wget --passive-ftp for more and more sites. Probably a good default. ron ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking

Hi! I use standard Bering 2.2.2. I am trying to get my FTP-server to work with another portnumber than 21 (On port 21 all works great, but I´m really interested in running two FTP-servers, so I want to figure this one out first). Read the FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FTP.html and now I got this setup: In Rules: DNAT net loc:192.168.3.2 tcp 99 In Shorewalls modules.conf (tried

Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K

Hello all, I just ran into something that I think is a bug, and I would like to confirm with the core team whether this is expected/desired behavior or if this is a bug that I should file and develop failing tests for (I doubt I have the active record method_missing fu to actually patch it). Test Scenario: I would like to find or initialize a new user and base the find on the users email

Renato, When I tried running "opcontrol --start" (after previously running "opcontrol --start-daemon") in dom0, I get this error message: /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1639: echo: write error: Operation not permitted and this message in the Xen console: (XEN) xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom 0 (status : -1) It looks like opcontrol is trying to do this: echo 1 >

Renato, When I tried running "opcontrol --start" (after previously running "opcontrol --start-daemon") in dom0, I get this error message: /usr/local/bin/opcontrol: line 1639: echo: write error: Operation not permitted and this message in the Xen console: (XEN) xenoprof: operation 9 failed for dom 0 (status : -1) It looks like opcontrol is trying to do this: echo 1 >

Hi all, I am planning my new gluster system and tested things out in a bunch of virtual machines. I need a bit of help to understand how geo-replication behaves. I have a master gluster cluster replica 2 (in production I will use an arbiter and replicatied/distributed) and the geo cluster is distributed with 2 machines. (in production I will have the geo cluster distributed) Everything is up

New install of CentOS 4.1; our first try at the 4.x. On previous 3.x installs we've used proftpd. On this one we're using (trying to use is a better statement of what we're going through) the default daemon, /usr/sbin/vsftpd. But we don't get anywhere. <snip> ftp> passiv Passive mode off. ftp> put ~/xorg.conf.work local: /home/jlasman/xorg.conf.work remote:

Hi, I''m using the same set of firewall rules of 2.0.x (sorry, I can''t remember the exact minor version) and put it to work with 2.0.9. And now I can''t do passive ftp (was working before). I see that my NEWNOTSYN is set to Yes, and the loc->net rule is blocking 1024:65535. But I believe with the ip_conntrack_ftp, the passive mode would be allowed, since

I have Centos 5.7 64bit; I have installed vsftpd as standalone service and using it for two years now with no problem. Suddenly; only it works with active mode. The passive mode stops working and gives time out. Firewall is disabled and SELinux is set to permissive. I ran tcpdump and I noticed that only first three packets reached the FTP for passive mode and no more packets on other ports #

Hi all, I am trying to do Xen / Kernel profiling. So I tried passive domain profile with oprofile tool in Dom0 as below. * Environment 1 + i7-2600 CPU + XCP 1.6 Base ISO + CentOS 6.3 Guest (HVM,PV) * Environment 2 + i7-2600 CPU + Xen hypervisor 4.2.1 + Konrad''s passive domain profiling patch applied Dom0 Kernel ( 2.6.32 jeremy branch & 3.2.44 mainline kernel) + CentOS 6.3

Hello I''ve setuped a bridge with iptables + layer + ipp2p + tc I don''t know how to shape passive ftp ? If I put rules on port 20, 21 or using layer 7 iptables accounting still empty ... When I done a tcpdump I can see that othe port than 20 or 21 are used ... Any Ideas of how I can achieve this ? Regards

Hi all, I want to run vsftp behind a firewall.(i.e DMZ zone) . It is runnig as passive ftp. the theroy behind passive ftp is , - FTP server's port 21 from anywhere ( Client initiates connection) - FTP server's port 21 to ports > 1024 (Server responds to client's control port) - FTP server's ports > 1024 from anywhere (Client initiates data connection to

I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this

Hi all, i had a replica 2 gluster 3.12 between S1 and S2 (1 brick per node) geo-replicated to S5 where both S1 and S2 were visible in the geo-replication status and S2 "active" while S1 "passive". I had to replace S1 with S3, so I did an "add-brick replica 3 S3" and then "remove-brick replica 2 S1". Now I have again a replica 2 gluster between S3 and S2

Howdy I'm trying to run FTP server behind firewall. And i can't enable passive mode from the Internet. There are plenty howtos but there aren't many with my combination. For now i have configured port forwarding and ftp server itself. On the router: # firewall-cmd --list-all --zone=external external (active) interfaces: enp3s1 sources: services: openvpn ssh ports: 1194/tcp

I'm attempting the heruclean task of teaching myself Introductory Statistics and R at the same time. I'm working through Peter Dalgaard's Introductory Statistics with R, but don't understand why the answer to one of the exercises works. I'm hoping someone will have the patience to explain the answer to me, both in the statistics and R areas. Exercise 6.1 says: The zelazo data