search for: passgang

You might realize I am digging into the details of the the debian Xen packages - so I find some opportunities to optimize them, which I report either here or as a bugreport. This one I just watched in Ralph Passgang's 3.1 packages, but I saw the same in the Debian packages(at least in stable), too: look at # for i in `ls /usr/lib/xen-3.1.0-1/bin`; do ls /usr/sbin/$i; done (with the correct version string, I suppose) And you'll see many xen standard binaries aren't linked into the path. At a gla...

Hi, One of my servers has had its dom0 "oops" over and over twice in the last week. Unfortunately this is newly deployed so I have no idea if it is down to Xen or not. xen_changeset : Mon Dec 12 18:47:47 2005 +0100 8270:4ad23e798798 dom0 kernel is a vanilla 2.6.12 with Ralph''s .6+xen kernel patch applied. x86_32 sarge packages were used. The .config is

...ransfig (closes: #321157) * Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org> - Change maintainer and add uploaders field * Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org> - Add dpatch structure to the package + - Remove build-dependency on gcc (it''s build essential anyway) * Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> - Added changes from 3.0.1-0tha3 - Removed patch generation from kernel source in debian/rules @@ -13,7 +17,7 @@ extraversion stripped off) - Changed debian/linux-patch-xen.kpatches - -- Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> Fri, 17 Feb...

...build-dependencies.it''s needed for VMX, otherwise Modified: trunk/control =================================================================== --- trunk/control 2006-02-15 23:05:09 UTC (rev 2) +++ trunk/control 2006-02-16 10:45:13 UTC (rev 3) @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ Source: xen -Maintainer: Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> +Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> +Uploaders: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>, Jeremy T. Bouse <jbouse@debian.org>, Guido Trotter <ultrotter@debian.org> Section: misc Priority: extra Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0

...=================== --- trunk/debian/patches/30rename-pae-hypervisor.dpatch 2006-02-18 22:36:52 UTC (rev 23) +++ trunk/debian/patches/30rename-pae-hypervisor.dpatch 2006-02-18 22:55:21 UTC (rev 24) @@ -1,32 +0,0 @@ -#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run -## 30rename-pae-hypervisor.dpatch by Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> -## -## All lines beginning with `## DP:'' are a description of the patch. -## DP: No description. - -@DPATCH@ -diff -Naur xen-3.0-testing.hg.old/xen/Makefile xen-3.0-testing.hg/xen/Makefile ---- xen-3.0-testing.hg.old/xen/Makefile 2006-02-16 23:44:09.000000000 +...

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-03-03 18:08:48 +0000 (Fri, 03 Mar 2006) New Revision: 70 Modified: trunk/xen-3.0/debian/changelog trunk/xen-3.0/debian/control trunk/xen-3.0/debian/xen-utils-3.0.postinst Log: The "Sorry for the step back, but I guess it''s more a 2 steps forwards" commit - Added the xen package again, because we believe there is a valid upgrade

Hello, I''m used to using Xen in a bridge mode where my dom0 and all domUs are on the same layer 2 network. However now I have to set up a server whose eth0 is on one network and the domUs will be on another /29. So, for example, if the eth0 of dom0 is 192.168.1.214/24, then I have 10.1.1.0/29 (10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.7) routed to it for use in domUs, how would I go about setting that up?

...an/patches/10sysconfig.dpatch =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/patches/10sysconfig.dpatch 2006-02-19 16:41:16 UTC (rev 25) +++ trunk/debian/patches/10sysconfig.dpatch 2006-02-19 18:38:10 UTC (rev 26) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ## 10sysconfig.dpatch by Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> ## ## All lines beginning with `## DP:'' are a description of the patch. -## DP: No description. +## DP: Move xendomains init script config file from /etc/sysconfig to /etc/default @DPATCH@ diff -Naur a/Makefile b/Makefile Added: trunk/debian/patches/30xen...

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-02-17 16:52:19 +0000 (Fri, 17 Feb 2006) New Revision: 13 Modified: trunk/debian/control Log: We don''t want to suggest linux-xen0-2.6, because that was just my xen0 kernel package. Modified: trunk/debian/control =================================================================== --- trunk/debian/control 2006-02-17 14:31:17 UTC (rev 12) +++

Hi, I have just looked at the xen source, because I want to finish my work from yesterday and have the hypervisor-pae really build & packaged. It seems so that we have two possibilities to do this: 1) create another dpatch that would patch xen/Makefile in order to have other filenames for the hypervisor when the pae-flag is set. the advanced would be, that if we use diffrent filenames

Is it possible to have a max. message size set for the automatic svn mails? it doesn't make sense that the whole kernel patch is included in the report. only files with less then maybe up to 100 hundred lines make sense. --Ralph p.s.: sorry for r25 mail in pkg-xen-changes ;-P

... is actually old & very well known by the maintainer! there is a bug report for exactly this that is 3 years and 124 days old! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=165505 I can also add my report to this bug and mention that we need a fixed version for our xen packages, but as it looks for me (at the moment) the maintainer is not really interessted in getting this

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-02-20 18:22:11 +0000 (Mon, 20 Feb 2006) New Revision: 40 Modified: trunk/debian/control trunk/debian/rules Log: - changed "hotplug | udev (>=0.059)" dependency to "hotplug | udev" - removed "hotplug" as build-dependency - updated rules file to have hotplug & udev etc files installed Modified: trunk/debian/control

Package: linux-source-2.6 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: important Tag: etch With 2.6.18-4 Debian switched from non-pae to pae-only xen kernels. This means that xen is not useable anymore for many users, which were able to use non-pae kernels without a problem for a long time till now. In my opinion this is a critical issue, because it makes xen unusable for about maybe 10-30% of all

...ccess for XEN itself. (new) xen-utils-3.1-1_3.1.0-1_i386.deb extra misc XEN administrative tools The userspace tools to manage a system virtualized through the XEN virtual machine monitor. Changes: xen-3 (3.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Julien Danjou ] * New upstream version. . [ Ralph Passgang ] * Added graphviz to Build-Indeps . [ Bastian Blank ] * Upstream removed one part of the version. Do it also. * Merge utils packages. * Install blktap support. * Install pygrub. * Install xenfb tools. * xenconsoled startup is racy, wait a little bit. Override entries for your pa...

Hello everyone, I''m hoping to find an answer to my problem here. Currently I''m installing xen 2.0.7 on 30 dual opteron machines with 4GB memory. The machines have Tyan K8SR as motherboard with Silicon Image 3114 chip sata controler and 2 x 300 GB Western Digital SATA drives. Each xen server has 5 domUs, where some of them have high traffic and thus require high disk usage.

...linux-xen0-2.6_2.6.12+xen3.0.1-0tha6_amd64.deb (xen-linux-2.6.12.6-xen). I successfully installed that combo on a Tyan GT20 Server with an Athlon64 3000+ (Venice), 1GB RAM . Thats running fine, I made some debootstrapped filebased debian sarge systems with xen-tools - no problem. Thanks to Ralph Passgang for this nice compilation ! However this was only testing - My real machines are a twin of Supermicro servers (Equipped with mainboard X6DHR-TG (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DHR-TG.cfm). 2x XEON 3,2 EMT64 with 4 GB RAM and SATA RAID1 (HW-Raid aacraid). Chipset is...

Author: tha-guest Date: 2006-02-18 16:38:52 +0000 (Sat, 18 Feb 2006) New Revision: 19 Modified: trunk/debian/control trunk/debian/patches/00list trunk/debian/rules trunk/debian/xen-hypervisor-pae.install trunk/debian/xen-hypervisor.install Log: - changed debian/rules to build a pae hypervisor on i386 (has to be done after the "make dist" for the non-pae stuff) - changed

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: minor The package description reads: This version of the hypervisor is built with PAE enabled, in order to support systems with more than 4GB of memory. If you have less than that you should probably choose the non -pae version. That's not entirely true. I tried installing the non-pae version on my ProLiant

...Suggest xen-tools in the xen metapackage - Make debian/rules policy compliant - Make SrvServer.py not executable - Make bugtool.py executable - Create NEWS.Debian file with important upgrade notices - Update copyright file - Remove the linux-patch-xen package * Ralph Passgang <ralph@debianbase.de> - Added changes from 3.0.1-0tha3 - Removed patch generation from kernel sources in debian/rules - Added the static file debian/linux-2.6.12-xen.patch (which patches a vanilla 2.6.12 to 2.6.12.6-xen, but still with the extraversion stripped of...