search for: pass's

...erl5: not found Errorlevel 127, running on '' => not using Trying Perl interpreter 'perl'... Errorlevel 0, running on 'linux, Perl version 5.014003' => using it + perl ./check.pl -p /home/root/anilss/AArch64/mksh_44-1/mksh/mksh -C shell:legacy-no,int:32 -v -s ./check.t pass ./check.t:KSH_VERSION pass ./check.t:selftest-1 pass ./check.t:selftest-2 pass ./check.t:selftest-3 pass ./check.t:selftest-direct-builtin-call pass ./check.t:alias-1 pass ./check.t:alias-2 pass ./check.t:alias-3 pass ./check.t:alias-4 pass ./check.t:alias-5 pass ./check.t:alias-6 pass ./check.t:al...

mainly question for the intel folks, any chance to rerun the ltp testsuites to see how we are doing these days with all the changes ? thanks :) Wim

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote: > Anil Singhar dixit: > > >Manual testing as provided within the package has been done with all > >tests passing. This includes the units tests available under > >usr/klibc/tests, usr/utils, usr/dash and usr/gzip. For dash and > >gzip, only sanity testing has been done. > > It?s *massively* recommended to try to build mksh against klibc > then run mksh?s testsuite, since it?s proven,...

flight 2041 xen-unstable real http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/2041/ Regressions :-( tests which did not succeed: test-amd64-amd64-pair 12 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-pv 8 guest-saverestore fail like 2017 test-amd64-amd64-win 6 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 2017 test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-localmigrate fail blocked in 2017 test-amd64-i386-pair 12 guest-migrate/src_host/dst...

On 6/20/16 3:46 PM, Yuxi Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > But I still don't know how a transform pass updates a new analysis > pass after it modifies the IR. Can you explain it clearly? I am not > familiar with pass management and invocation. Passes can have methods that allow their internal state to be updated by other passes (the same way that their state can be queried by other passes...

On 6/5/12 10:39 AM, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hi John, > > On 6/5/12 4:31 PM, John Criswell wrote: >> On 4/12/12 3:32 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: >>> Hi again, >>> >>> I come back to this issue with an example. It's a pass which does >>> nothing but throw the 'Unable to schedule' error. >>> >>> namespace { >>> struct MyPass : public FunctionPass { >>> static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid >>> MyPass() : FunctionP...

The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. I am awa...

I'd like to write a pass that does both: implements a code transformation *and *saves information that can be accessed by subsequent passes. If such a pass is not an Analysis pass and that therefore subsequent passes are not supposed to use getAnalysis() to extract the information from that pass... what is the right way t...

...25, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Kaylor, Andrew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. > &g...

...Andrew via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. I am awa...

...;4G IA32E SMP Window RTM Vista VMX domain + Can bootup >4G IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain For details ------------------------------------------------------------ Platform: IA32 Service OS: FC5, IA32, SMP Hardware: Conroe Default guest OS: IA32,SMP, 2.6 kernel 1, one xenU domain with memory 256M PASS 2, one IA32 nonPAE SMP VMX domain with memory 256M PASS 3, one IA32 nonPAE SMP VMX domain with memory 512M PASS 4, one VMX boot with IA32 nonPAE SMP base kernel(2.6.16) PASS 5, one IA32 nonPAE SMP VMX domain with acpi enable PASS 6, Two IA32 nonPAE SMP VMX domains and 2 xenU domains coexist PASS...

Greetings folks! In working on a new optimization pass (splitting cold regions into separate functions based on branch probabilities) I've run into some limitations of the current pass manager infrastructure. After chatting about this with Nick, it seems that there are some pretty systematic weaknesses of the current design and implementation (but...

...<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. >>...

...lvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. > &g...

...Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:44 PM, Yuxi Chen via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> When I use llvm, I encounter a problem like "unable to schedule pass >> A required by C" >> I investigated deeper. It's like: >> I have three passes, say A, B, C(all are on function level) >> A would modify IR code. (change instruction order) >> >> For pass B, >> I would use the result of pass A, I use addRequired&...

Let's say I have an analysis pass that's dependent on another analysis pass (getAnalysisUsage does the appropraite things). So Pass Y depends on Pass X. If some transformation pass depends on Pass Y and Pass Y has not been invalidated by another other pass BUT Pass X _has_ been invalidated by some other pass, what happens?...

Looking through some of the remaining test failures under the new pass manager, I've narrowed down one of the failures in GWPAsan(!) to the fact that the new pass manager doesn't properly skip passes like the old pass manager. For example, when a function is marked optnone, or when using https://llvm.org/docs/OptBisect.html. Lots of passes (e.g. SROA) will do...

Could somebody please explain exactly what an "analysis pass" is? I've spent some time trying to understand this and I just don't get it. Right now my understanding is the following: if a pass is an "analysis" pass, the "print" function is called when giving the "-analyze" switch to opt. Is there more to it than...

On Jul 25, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Marc de Kruijf wrote: > I'd like to write a pass that does both: implements a code > transformation and saves information that can be accessed by > subsequent passes. Ideally, we want to use two separate pass. However, it is quiet possible that your requirement is unique. Would it be possible to provide more info. on what your pass...

...m-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> The Intel C++ compiler has long had an internal facility to help our development teams track down the source of optimization related bugs by allowing a sort of binary search in which optimization passes and even individual optimizations are selectively disabled in response to front end command line options. As we've been doing development work on LLVM our developers have found that we miss this capability and so we would like to introduce something like this to the LLVM code base. >>&...