search for: partnum_ret

...44 --- a/src/inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static int check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, int whole_device); static void extend_fses (guestfs_h *g); static int get_partition_context (guestfs_h *g, const char *partition, int *partnum_ret, int *nr_partitions_ret); +static int is_symlink_to (guestfs_h *g, const char *file, const char *wanted_target); /* Find out if 'device' contains a filesystem. If it does, add * another entry in g->fses. @@ -215,8 +216,7 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable,...

...int check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, const struct guestfs_internal_mountable *m, int whole_device); static int extend_fses (guestfs_h *g); +static int get_partition_context (guestfs_h *g, const char *partition, int *partnum_ret, int *nr_partitions_ret); /* Find out if 'device' contains a filesystem. If it does, add * another entry in g->fses. @@ -140,17 +141,18 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, const struct guestfs_internal_mountable *m, int wh...

...> +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static int check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, > int whole_device); > static void extend_fses (guestfs_h *g); > static int get_partition_context (guestfs_h *g, const char *partition, int *partnum_ret, int *nr_partitions_ret); > +static int is_symlink_to (guestfs_h *g, const char *file, const char *wanted_target); > > /* Find out if 'device' contains a filesystem. If it does, add > * another entry in g->fses. > @@ -215,8 +216,7 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, c...

...t char *mountable, const struct guestfs_internal_mountable *m, int whole_device); -static int extend_fses (guestfs_h *g); +static void extend_fses (guestfs_h *g); static int get_partition_context (guestfs_h *g, const char *partition, int *partnum_ret, int *nr_partitions_ret); /* Find out if 'device' contains a filesystem. If it does, add @@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ guestfs_int_check_for_filesystem_on (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable) mountable, vfs_type ? vfs_type : "failed to get vfs type"); if (is_swap) { - i...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid