search for: partitially

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "partitially".

Did you mean: paritially
2010 Feb 05
1
rsync 3.0.7 - error deleting directory
Hi, based on a nightly cronjob we use "rsync --delete" to delete partitial directory structure from a backup folder. Sometimes rsync is unable to delete structure as told. rsync: unlink "/backup/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3" failed: Is a directory (21) rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1042) [sender=3.0.7]
2010 Nov 24
8
hard links across snapshots/subvolumes are actually a bad idea.
I''ve been thinking about this for a while, from a perspective of how to make it work by allocating i-node numbers from a global pool, but yesterday I realized that offering the feature would be a bad idea because it violates the semantics of file systems. I will be happy to expand on that point if anyone disagrees with it. dln -- "It is merely a matter of persistence." --
2001 Feb 07
1
[Fwd: RedHat 7.0, Wine en Matlab: een fontprobleem??]
Beste, ik heb getracht om Matlab (versie 6.0.0.88 Release 12 op Win98 op aparte partitie op mijn hd) mbv wine te draain op mijn RedHat 7.0. Het betreft codeweavers-wine, versie 20010112. Matlab start heel fijn op, wine spuwt een proces of 15 en vreet zowat al mijn geheugen op maar voor de rest lijkt hij wel te werken. (Andere applicaties zoals notepad, wordpad, freecell, etc werkten perfect..)
2005 Jul 12
2
test76-77 dies at SIGHUP
Hello people This is on OpenBSD/sparc64. After chickening along with 0.99 for a while, I finally upgraded to 1.0-test. I started out with test73, which worked fine. With the upgrade to test76, I lost the ability to SIGHUP dovecot when I rotated it's logfile. Dovecot would just die abruptly, not a trace in the log. I just upgraded to test77, but the problem is still there. I've put
2015 Sep 02
2
[PULL 0/8] MultiFS suppport for BIOS and EFI
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:56 PM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On 07/23/2015 02:09 PM, Raphael S Carvalho via Syslinux wrote: >>> >> My sincere opinion is to apply this patchset as-is, and incrementally >> improve multifs. Lack of alternatives (additional features) *should not* be >> a reason to block this patchset. Again, I really
2001 Feb 08
0
hello, I need some help for using wine...
hello, thanks for all for helping me. Yves -----Message d'origine----- De : wine-users-admin@winehq.com [mailto:wine-users-admin@winehq.com]De la part de wine-users-request@winehq.com Envoy? : jeudi 8 f?vrier 2001 01:17 ? : wine-users@winehq.com Objet : wine-users digest, Vol 1 #309 - 9 msgs Send wine-users mailing list submissions to wine-users@winehq.com To subscribe or unsubscribe