search for: particullary

Hi, I'm wondering if samba supports NTLMv2, particullary NTLMv2 session security. But I can't even get NTLM-only to work :(. I'm trying to increase lmcompatibilitylevel, but I can't connect to the samba server anymore when I set it to 2 or higher ("Send NTLM authenication only"). I'm using HEAD CVS of today, and my smb.conf lo...

I'm trying to use Rprof() to identify bottlenecks and speed up a particullary slow section of code which reads in a portion of a tif file and compares each of the values to values of predictors used for model fitting. I've written up an example that anyone can run. Generally temp would be a section of a tif read into a data.frame and used later for other processing. T...

...in goal would be the reconstruction of random effect density, because we are interest in founding (if present) groups of "similar" hospitals. Now, I found some trouble in doing this beause I don't understand how outputs "ss", "ncluster" and "mub" work. Particullary, how does the package compute "ss" starting from "ncluster" distribution? How should I interpret the vector "mub"? I tried to look into the fortrand code, but I'm not used to that language so it didn't help me a lot. Could anybody make me understand how &q...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Attached is a patch to add a progress meter for ssh-keygen similar to the one in the commercial ssh1. Was this left out of the OpenBSD version because of security concerns? Regards, Damien Miller - -- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org

Am 21.06.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 23:35 +0200, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >> Can you do this against the secrets.keytab in Samba's private/ dir? >>> You can reset the Samba machine account pw with >>> ./source4/scripting/devel/chgtdcpass, but: >>> - it wont be packaged so you will have to build Samba and tell it

Hi All, whilst not being an expert on iptables, the below ouput of iptables -L seems too insecure to me. Does anyone agree.? Perhaps I'm not understanding it as well as I think I am.? Please give your thoughts on this. Cheers. Mark Sargent. [root at localhost racket]# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all

...es_added/changed_(by_release) > And a summerize version for with all parameter changes as of upgrade from 4.2 up to 4.6 > http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Upgrade-info.txt > Same as the wiki links but just summerized the parameter changes. I know that there is a lot of work (like this particullary). I think to create test domain on 4.6 with 1-2 desktops to ensure working configuration, but maybe there is some side effects like as OP's cause.. -- Administrator