search for: partical

Hi, P-values in Durbin-Watson test obtained through the use of functions available in packages "lmtest" and "car" are different. The difference is quite significant. function "dwtest" in "lmtest" is much faster than "burbinwatson" in "car". Actually, you can take a nap while the latter trying to calculated Durbin-Watson test. My question

At the end of the 'Details:' section of the help on Anova (car package), it states: The standard R `anova' function calculates sequential (type-I) tests. These rarely test meaningful hypotheses. So I thought I'd try it. However, I was perplexed to get this message: Browse[1]> Anova.glm(leaf.glm1, type ="II") Error in terms.formula(formula, data = data) :

...t a time. So I have a link for the next and previous month, when clicked the grid is replaced with the correct month''s grid. How best to do this, im thinking ajax would be the wrong choice and I may be better to do it all client side using javascript, but then I dont get access to the partical... so ajax it must be?? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

If one estimates a model using multinom, is it possible to perform the omnibus LR test ( the analogue to omnibus F in linear models ) using the output from multinom ? The residual deviance is there but I was hoping I could somehow pull out the deviance based on just using an intercept ? Sample code is below from the CAR book but I wasn't sure how to do it based on that example. Thanks

Hello! I am trying to reproduce (for a publication) analyses that I ran several months ago using lavaan, I'm not sure which version, probably 0.4-12. A sample model is given below: pathmod='mh30days.log.w2 ~ mh30days.log + joingroup + leavegroup + alwaysgroup + grp.partic.w2 + black + age + bivoc + moved.conf + local.noretired + retired + ds + ministrytime + hrswork + nomoralescore.c +

I have design with two repeated-measures factor, and no grouping factor. I can analyze the dataset successfully in other software, including my legacy DOS version BMDP, and R's 'aov' function. I would like to use 'Anova' in 'car' in order to obtain the sphericity tests and the H-F corrected p-values. I do not believe the data are truly deficient in rank. I

...html are supposed to render. Ok, now, here''s what I''m getting, and ALL I''m getting in my "main" div: $("index").hide(); Which is correct. . .sort of. It DOES hide the index object correctly, but displays the above in the div and does not show my partical in the "main" div. Been working on this for about 24 hours, most of that spent googling and reading over everybody''s examples (again, and again, and again : b). Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. I know something silly is going on here, but for the life of me I can'...

First, a big thanks to all of the developers and users that have worked to make R such useful software. It is only because I find the software so useful that I have the following opinions. A recent post to R-devel listed the 'Top 10 Features' for one person. I found it to be quite an interesting read. Over the past couple of years I have assembled my own lists. Retrospective. Some of

...m_gpuva_sm_unmap() uses &drm_gpuva_fn_ops + * to call back into the driver in order to unmap a range of GPU VA space. The + * logic behind this function is way simpler though: For all existent mappings + * enclosed by the given range unmap operations are created. For mappings which + * are only partically located within the given range, remap operations are + * created such that those mappings are split up and re-mapped partically. + * + * As an alternative to drm_gpuva_sm_map() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap(), + * drm_gpuva_sm_map_ops_create() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap_ops_create() can be used + * to direc...

...m_gpuva_sm_unmap() uses &drm_gpuva_fn_ops + * to call back into the driver in order to unmap a range of GPU VA space. The + * logic behind this function is way simpler though: For all existent mappings + * enclosed by the given range unmap operations are created. For mappings which + * are only partically located within the given range, remap operations are + * created such that those mappings are split up and re-mapped partically. + * + * As an alternative to drm_gpuva_sm_map() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap(), + * drm_gpuva_sm_map_ops_create() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap_ops_create() can be used + * to direc...

...m_gpuva_sm_unmap() uses &drm_gpuva_fn_ops + * to call back into the driver in order to unmap a range of GPU VA space. The + * logic behind this function is way simpler though: For all existent mappings + * enclosed by the given range unmap operations are created. For mappings which + * are only partically located within the given range, remap operations are + * created such that those mappings are split up and re-mapped partically. + * + * As an alternative to drm_gpuva_sm_map() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap(), + * drm_gpuva_sm_map_ops_create() and drm_gpuva_sm_unmap_ops_create() can be used + * to direc...