Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "parseobjectbodi".
Did you mean:
parseobjectbody
2012 Jan 20
1
[LLVMdev] TableGen Crash
Hi LLVMers,
I found a bug in TGParser that is causing llvm-tblgen to crash on bad
input. The reduced testcase is attached. The output follows:
$ ./llvm-tblgen --version
Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/):
LLVM version 3.1svn
DEBUG build with assertions.
Built Jan 20 2012 (15:46:08).
Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0
Host CPU: penryn
$ ./llvm-tblgen bug.td
0
2010 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] Assertion failure in tablegen: rationale ?
Hello,
I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a
compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure
on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug):
class Bli<string _t>
{
string t = _t;
}
class Bla<list<Bli> _bli>
: Bli<!car(_bli).t>
{
}
#0 0x00007ffff6ebda75 in *__GI_raise
2010 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] Assertion failure in tablegen: rationale ?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Amaury Pouly wrote:
> Hello,
> I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug):
David, can you take a look? This is related to your lisp interpreter :)
-Chris
>
> class
2011 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
On Oct 11, 2011, at 2:03 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> I'd assume something like:
>
> for (x, y) = [(1, 4), (2, 5), (3, 6)] in { ... }
>
> Though I don't know a great deal about tablegen syntax. But so long as the lists are separate it seems it'd always be unclear that it was a zip.
+1
Nobody actually needs the zip functionality anyway.
/jakob
-------------- next
2013 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] Length restriction in tablegen
On Jun 25, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Anitha B Gollamudi <anitha.boyapati at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some sort of restriction over class length names in td files.
Only your own sanity, as far as I know.
> For e.g. something like below gives an abort with tablegen. The abort goes away when I reduce the name "my_target_intrinsics_class..." to something shorter. I have not
2013 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] Length restriction in tablegen
Hi
Is there some sort of restriction over class length names in td files. For
e.g. something like below gives an abort with tablegen. The abort goes away
when I reduce the name "my_target_intrinsics_class..." to something
shorter. I have not counted the exact length limit though. Is this a known
issue?
defm target_intrinsic:
2010 Sep 01
1
[LLVMdev] Assertion failure in tablegen: rationale ?
While I'm at it, I noticed a behaviour which is not exactly related but
similar. To put it simply, you can 't do T.V.W, you need to do
!cast<Bla>(T.V).W
Example:
class Bla<string t>
{
string blu = t;
}
class Bli<Bla t>
{
Bla bla = t;
}
def a : Bli<Bla<"">>;
def b : Bla<!cast<Bla>(a.bla).blu>; // works
def b :
2011 Oct 11
4
[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen
On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Perhaps a minor note, but can I'd prefer we call them something other than a "for loop." That implies a more procedural nature than is natural for the language. TableGen is far more declarative that procedural. Even something simple like using a "for each" type syntax and refering to the construct as a "for each