search for: parseidentifi

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "parseidentifi".

Did you mean: parseidentifier
2015 Feb 05
4
[LLVMdev] Fwd: [cfe-dev] freebsd-mips64 unhandled .cpsetup
Moving to llvmdev, as this is not a clang issue. David > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: 5 February 2015 17:00:34 GMT > From: Sean Bruno <sbruno at ignoranthack.me> > To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [cfe-dev] freebsd-mips64 unhandled .cpsetup > Reply-To: sbruno at freebsd.org > > > I'm taking a journey to try and get a clang/llvm build of
2010 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] MC: Object file specific parsing
...ual bool ParseInstruction(const StringRef &Name, SMLoc NameLoc, + SmallVectorImpl<MCParsedAsmOperand*> &Operands) = 0; + virtual const MCSection *getInitialTextSection() = 0; /// } -private: +protected: + + bool TokError(const char *Msg); + + /// ParseIdentifier - Parse an identifier or string (as a quoted identifier) + /// and set \arg Res to the identifier contents. + bool ParseIdentifier(StringRef &Res); + MCSymbol *CreateSymbol(StringRef Name); +private: bool ParseStatement(); - - bool TokError(const char *Msg); void PrintMessag...
2013 Dec 19
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] MC: handle .cfi_startproc simple
...at apple.com> > Cc: Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> > --- > This time, I know for certain that I've done something stupid because > a huge number of tests break. Did I misunderstand how > parseIdentifier() is meant to be used? Am I atleast passing this > Simple bool around correctly, and appending " simple" in the low asm > layer appropriately? What am I missing? > > Thanks. > > include/llvm/MC/MCStreamer.h | 2 +- > lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/Dwar...
2015 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] freebsd-mips64 unhandled .cpsetup
...parseExpression() but I am unfamiliar with the syntax to do >> this for .cpsetup. >> >> If you do look into this, let me know and I'll bang on it in my >> clang36 pre-release tree. >> >> sean >> > > Hi, > > I've managed to replace parseIdentifier() with parseExpression() > and you're example doesn't give an error anymore, but I'm not sure > that what we end up generating is correct. I need a little more > time to find out. > > In the meantime, could you open a ticket on llvm.org/bugs ? > > Thanks for wor...