search for: parseability

When doing a "sip show peers" I might see something like: Name/username Host Dyn Nat ACL Port Status devcentos5x64_to_mmfirepa 192.168.1.177 5060 Unmonitored devcentos5x64_to_bt610tMM 192.168.1.159 5060 Unmonitored devcentos5x64_to_am2mm/de 192.168.1.178 5060

Tested in R 2.8.1 Windows > ff <- formals(function(x)1) > ff1 <- as.list(function(x)1)[1] # ff1 acts the same as ff in the examples below, but is a list rather than a pairlist > dput( ff , control=c("warnIncomplete")) list(x = ) This string is not parsable, but dput does not give a warning as specified. > dput( ff ,

Hi, Pino 在 2015年06月17日 23:37, Pino Toscano 写道: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 10:12:59 Cao jin wrote: >>>> @@ -2083,3 +2083,72 @@ do_btrfs_image (char *const *sources, const char *image, >>>> >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> + >>>> +char ** >>>> +do_btrfs_device_stats (const char *path, int zero)

TLDR: a proposal to add GC-parseable lowering to element atomic memcpy/memmove instrinsics controlled by a new "requires-statepoint” call attribute. Currently llvm.{memcpy|memmove}.element.unordered.atomic calls are considered as GC leaf functions (like most other intrinsics). As a result GC cannot occur while copy operation is in progress. This might have negative effect on GC latencies

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> Why do we need a custom dumping format for the summary? Since

Taking David's example further, here is a first try: id | name | description | more info -----+---------+-------------------+----------------- 6 | Inset | An inset element | just one element 8 | Stories | Another element | another element : with 2 lines, without : colons on the left. 9 | Other

Thanks for the feedback. I think both of the suggestions are very reasonable. I’ll incorporate them. Given there were no objections for two weeks, I’m going to go ahead with posting individual patches for review. One small question inline: On Sep 28, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com<mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: In general, I am

If a disk has type 0x42 partition (which would indicate LDM), but LDM is not available then try parsing the partition anyway. It might be parseable as plain old NTFS. --- src/listfs.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/listfs.c b/src/listfs.c index bbdb0a2..ffb0adc 100644 --- a/src/listfs.c +++ b/src/listfs.c @@ -47,8 +47,11 @@

When I try to run autotest (zenspider) (which looks VERY cool), I get this error: (run from within a Rails app directory) C:\ruby_home\analysis>autotest -rails # Testing updated files + c:/ruby/bin/ruby -Ilib:test -e ''["test/unit/user_test.rb", "test/unit/role_test.rb"].each { |f| load f }'' | unit_diff -u ''c:'' is not recognized

Since libvirt 2.0.0, these two new <listen/> types have been supported: https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsGraphics This change just copies that configuration over from the source to the destination if the destination is also libvirt. Since we previously used 'LNone' to mean "no parseable <listen/> element" I also had to change previous uses of

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Why do we need a custom dumping format for the summary? Since we already > need the YAML format anyway, wouldn't it be better to extend that to cover > the entire summary? > IMO it is useful/convenient to be able to see the summary in the llvm-dis output. Teresa >

Hi, Pino 在 2015年06月18日 16:41, Pino Toscano 写道: > Hi, > > On Thursday 18 June 2015 11:01:37 Cao jin wrote: >>> Speaking of this: you said that you have a colleague working on >>> btrfs-progs? What about suggesting to create some machine-parseable >>> output (csv, xml, yaml, json, whatever) so extracting the results of >>> btrfs tools is a lot more easy?

Hello all, I set up a samba server(3.4.13) that guest has access to it. When I run command ?net status shares parseable? on the server, it shows results like this: test\17358\\\pc-vincent\\Thu Aug 25 15:00:49 2011 And there?s no ip address for the client. I googled the reason and hacked the samba source code, I found this comments in function session_claim() of file

Is there a good place to get information about the list of all possible output and error messages rsync generates? Or should I just muck around the source code (which I haven't looked at yet) and find them? I am doing something where I would like to parse rsync's output using Perl into a set of data structures. I already have something that works under normal conditions. Eventually

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5256 Summary: make -i format more consistent [*deleting] Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: 14709c93@mailinator.com

Quick thought, if the fields are separated by "," & a title/artist/.. has a comma in it then it causes a few problems with parsing. Likewise if there are multiple streams it might be nice to have each stream in it's own line so it is easier to grab the info. Also, status.xsl displays streams even after they have been stopped. dmz --- >8 ---- List archives:

On 08/17/2018 10:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:30:35AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 08/17/2018 10:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Commit bd1c5c9f4dcf38458099db8a0bf4659a07ef055d changed all the code >>> to use Jansson instead of yajl. However it didn't change the OCaml >>> API name (which was still Yajl). >>>

Not sure if you are asking about server or client. Are you asking about : 1. Pushing GPOs via Linux SaMBa Server to Windows machines? 1. i believe this has been somewhat doable for years using a windows workstation mmc pointed at a Samba Server. 2. Pushing GPOs via Linux SaMBa Server to Linux machines? 1. At least four years ago, LikeWise.com had some very limited GPO

With the current version (rw1070), every time I start R it loads a whole bunch of packages, many of which I do not need in a typical session: > search() [1] ".GlobalEnv" "package:methods" "package:ctest" "package:mva" [5] "package:modreg" "package:nls" "package:ts" "Autoloads" [9]

Am 14.03.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Thomas G?ttler > <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> >> >> >> Am 14.03.2017 um 15:10 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: >>> Look into the "autossh" program, which is very good to manage and >>> maintain such tunnels. >>> >> >> Hi