search for: parse_spnego_mechanisms

...7:46:37, 3] smbd/ sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(1029) Doing spnego session setup [2008/01/07 17:46:37, 3] smbd/ sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego(1060) NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] PrimaryDomain=[] [2008/01/07 17:46:37, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:parse_spnego_mechanisms(667) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 2 840 48018 1 2 2 [2008/01/07 17:46:37, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:parse_spnego_mechanisms(667) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2008/01/07 17:46:37, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(697) reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob...

Hello. I have a print server member of an AD domain, and my users are autenthicated through an external kerberos domain. My samba server FQDN is 'etoile.msr-inria.inria.fr', and has 'cups.msr-inria.inria.fr' as DNS alias. For foreign visitors, everything works fine: when attempting to reach \\cups, samba immediatly detect from given credentials than user comes from an

...c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego) Doing spnego session setup [2010/05/12 09:14:34.412032, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego) NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[] [2010/05/12 09:14:34.412309, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:753(parse_spnego_mechanisms) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1.2.840.48018.1.2.2 [2010/05/12 09:14:34.412364, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:753(parse_spnego_mechanisms) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2 [2010/05/12 09:14:34.412424, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:753(parse_spnego_mechanisms) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Go...

...session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:(1040) Doing spnego session setup [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:(1071) NativeOS=[] NativeLanMan=[] PrimaryDomain=[] [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:(669) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 2 840 48018 1 2 2 [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:(669) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:(669) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2010/08/10 20:05:22, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:(699) reply_spne...

...09/02/16 13:15:08, 10] smbd/password.c:register_initial_vuid(194) register_initial_vuid: allocated vuid = 100 [2009/02/16 13:15:08, 10] smbd/sesssetup.c:check_spnego_blob_complete(1121) check_spnego_blob_complete: needed_len = 74, pblob->length = 74 [2009/02/16 13:15:08, 5] smbd/sesssetup.c:parse_spnego_mechanisms(749) parse_spnego_mechanisms: Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2009/02/16 13:15:08, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(800) reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 40 [2009/02/16 13:15:08, 5] auth/auth.c:make_auth_context_subsystem(524) Using specified auth order [2009/02/16 13:1...

...#12 0x31f4d8 <auth_ntlmssp_start+550> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #13 0x127954 <ntlmssp_set_username+1675> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #14 0x127194 <ntlmssp_update+659> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #15 0x31f239 <auth_ntlmssp_update+60> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #16 0xb291d <parse_spnego_mechanisms+2733> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #17 0xb3e48 <reply_sesssetup_and_X+2723> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #18 0xe90cf <remove_deferred_open_smb_message+2063> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #19 0xeb37e <smbd_process+2390> at /usr/local/sbin/smbd #20 0x4fcdb1 <main+8819> at /usr/...

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --