search for: parse_generic

...true + +(* Parse any generic /etc/x-release file. + * + * The optional regular expression which may match 0, 1 or 2 + * substrings, which are used as the major and minor numbers. + * + * The fixed distro is always set, and the product name is + * set to the first line of the release file. + *) +and parse_generic ?rex distro release_file data = + let chroot = Chroot.create ~name:"parse_generic" () in + let product_name = + Chroot.f chroot ( + fun () -> + if not (is_small_file release_file) then ( + eprintf "%s: not a regular file or too large\n" release_file;...

...) + +(* Parse any generic /etc/x-release file. + * + * The optional regular expression which may match 0, 1 or 2 + * substrings, which are used as the major and minor numbers. + * + * The fixed distro is always set, and the product name is + * set to the first line of the release file. + *) +and parse_generic ?rex distro release_file data = + let chroot = Chroot.create ~name:"parse_generic" () in + let product_name = + Chroot.f chroot ( + fun () -> + if not (is_small_file release_file) then ( + eprintf "%s: not a regular file or too large\n" release_file;...

...= check_hostname_from_file "/etc/myname" +let hurd_root_tests : tests = [ + (* Newer distros include /etc/os-release which is reasonably + * standardized. This entry should be first. + *) + "/etc/os-release", parse_os_release; + "/etc/debian_version", parse_generic DISTRO_DEBIAN; + (* Arch Hurd also exists, but inconveniently it doesn't have + * the normal /etc/arch-release file. XXX + *) +] + (* The currently mounted device may be a Hurd root. Hurd has distros * just like Linux. *) @@ -705,13 +716,7 @@ let rec check_hurd_root mountable data =...

...ease release_file data = let chroot = Chroot.create ~name:"parse_suse_release" () in - let lines = Chroot.f chroot (fun () -> read_small_file release_file) () in + let lines = Chroot.f chroot read_small_file release_file in match lines with | None @@ -297,14 +297,14 @@ and parse_generic ?rex distro release_file data = let chroot = Chroot.create ~name:"parse_generic" () in let product_name = Chroot.f chroot ( - fun () -> - if not (is_small_file release_file) then ( - eprintf "%s: not a regular file or too large\n" release_file;...

This is the (incomplete) patch which reimplements inspection APIs in the daemon. All ‘XXX’s in this patch indicate areas which are not yet implemented or need further work. Rich.

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.